Research on Educational Sport

Designing of affective factors of knowledge Maturity in employees of Physical Education and Health Department uses the FCM model

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 MA student of sport management,University of Science and Research Branch, Tehran

2 assistant Professor of physical education,Qazvin Islamic Azad University

3 Assistent proffesor,Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah

Abstract
The propose of this study was Designing of affective factors of knowledge Maturity in employees of Physical Education and Health Department uses the FCM model.
. The research method is a survey and its target is applicable. The face validity of the Questionnaire is verified by some of management professionals. For this purpose, a review of previous studies and also of experts comment, we identified 17 variables that influence in knowledge Maturity. Then, this variables for weighting was provided to experts through a questionnaire, and this 10 variables was extracted in the form of a Fuzzy questionnaire for weighting was of the 15 Members of the focus group. Results show that variables; Creativity, education, motivation, experience, leadership, organizational culture, organizational structure, organizational strategies, information management and organizational communications, and human resources management As the main factors affecting the maturity of knowledge have been identified.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Fazeli, F., Safania, A. M., Hoseini, S. E., & Amirnezhad, S. (2016). The relationship between organizational structural and cultural factors with successful establishment of knowledge management in selected sport organizations in Iran. Journal of Sport Management and Action behavior, 12(24), 39-52.
  2. Holsapple, C.W. & Joshi, K. D. (2000). An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 6 (9): 35 - 61.
  3. Holsapple, C. W., & Joshi, K. D. (2000). An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2), 235-61.
  4. Hoseini, M. (2015). Introducing the method of the focal group and its application in research. Tehran: Center of Research and Opinion Survey. (Persian).
  5. Iraji, N. R., Hadavi, F., & Tondnevis, F. (2015). Determining the structural equation model of knowledge management and organizational innovation in employees of sport and Youth Offices in Khorasan Razavi province. Journal of sport Management, 7(3), 403-419. (Persian).
  6. Kanat, S., & Atilgan, T. (2014). Effects of knowledge management on supply chainmanagement in the clothing sector: Turkish case. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 103, 9–13.
  7. Khavari Khorasani, L., Hamidi, M., Sajjadi, S., Jalali Farahani, M. (2016). Modeling of Facilitators to Implementation of Knowledge Management Strategy of National Olympic Committee of IRAN. Sport Management Studies, 8(38), 183-204. doi: 10.22089/smrj.2016.843
  8. Kim, Y, & Adler, M. 2015. Social scientists’ Data Sharing behaviors: Investigating the roles of individual motivations,institutional pressures,and data repositories. International Journal of Information Management 35: 408-418.
  9. Naghavi S., A., Mirghafoori, S. H., & Morovati A. (2016). Identification and prioritization of key factors in successful implementation of knowledge. Management in Sport Organization, 8(36), 12-93. (Persian).
  10. Nemati, M. A., & Jamshidi, L. (2007). Investigating the relationship and the effect of the process of sharing knowledge and experience on the development of social capital among the members of the Technology Center of Shahid Beheshti University Development Center. Paper presented at the First of National Conference of Knowledge Management, Razi Conference Center, Tehran.
  11. Parent, M. M., MacDonald, D., & Goulet, G. (2013). The theory and practice of knowledge management and transfer: The case of the Olympic Games. Sport Management Review, 17(2), 205-218.
  12. Pee, L. G., & Lee, J. (2015). Intrinsically motivating employees’ online knowledge sharing: understanding the effects of job design. International Journal of Information Management, 35(6), 679-690.
  13. Probst, G. J. (1998). Practical knowledge management: A model that works. PRISM-CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS-, 17-30.
  14. Skyrme, D. J., & Amidon, D. M. (1997). Creating the knowledge-based business. London: Business Intelligence.
  15. Wang, T., & Chang, T. (2007). Forecasting the probability of successful knowledge management by consistent fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applicationa, 32(3), 801-813.
  16. Wong, K. Y., & Aspinwal, L. E. (2005). An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME secto. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 64-82.
  17. Yousefi, A., & Gholami, B. (2006). Entrepreneurship Isfahan on the establishment of knowledge management in education organization in Isfahan in the academic year 85-84. Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(11), 29-48. (Persian).

2.       Hariharan, A. (2008). Knowledge management: Strategic tool. Journal of Knowledge Management, 82(2), 52-63.

3.       Hatami, S., Saboonchi, R., & Sobhani, Y. (2015). Presenting a model of key factors of knowledge management success to increase organizational creativity and learning inMinistry of Sport and Youth of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Sport Management , 7(3), 253-266. (Persian).

 

Research on Educational Sport
Volume 6, Issue 15
Fall 2018& Winter 2019
November 2018
Pages 161-178

  • Receive Date 16 August 2017
  • Revise Date 11 October 2017
  • Accept Date 04 November 2017

Home

Publication Ethics

Submit Manuscript

News

Journal Metrics

Contact Us