Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

The aim study was to compare of risk perception among participating sports activitiesstudents. Samples were selected from a population of university student athletes (girls and boys) participating in educational classes, members of sports teams and athletic programs. The sample size was set up based on all 901 samples in full. Research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire namely “the Perception of Risk Questionnaire (PRQ)”. Its validity was approved by 11 experts in the field of sport management. Moreover, its reliability was estimated by the Cronbach's alpha of 0.84 in a pilot study. Results from the survey data using Kolmogorov-smirnoff and U-Mann Whitney tests were extracted. The results showed there are significant differences between girls  and  boys  student  in  risk perception on the criteria of  Sensation seeking ,fear of injury, self-confidence‌ and experience. also, no significant difference was observed between girls  and boys  student  on the criteria of  injury background  Effect  and Success Effect in the repetition of risky activities .it  indicate the  same attitude of  boys  and  girls  at  the  mentioned  indexes. Managers of sport organization should be as a perceived attitudes the participants in sports activities, for survival of  your organization and also providing safety and health athletes, so  this way be removed critical steps to identify  the perception student  of  risk that could leads to  lack of their participation in sport  activity.

Keywords

1. Jaeger, c.c., rein, o., Rose, e.a. and webler, t. Risk uncertainty and rational action. Sterling, VA: Earths can Publications Ltd.2001.
2. Dickson, t. and dolnica, s. No risk no fun: the role of perceived risk in adventure tourism, school of management marketing & employment relation university of Wollongong. 2004.
3. بقایی حسین آبادی علی . ریسک : مبانی نظری ، کاربردها و ضرورت ادراک آن ، مجله توسعه مدیریت ،1380، 29: 28-24.
4. Gregory, e., Prussia, b., Karen, a., brown, b. and geoffwillis, c. Mental model of safety: do manager and employee see eye to eye؟ Journal of safety research. 2003; 143: 156-34
5. Burns, w. j. Risk perception: a review.2007.
6. Duffy, v.g. Effects of training and experience on perception of hazard and risk ergonomics. 2003؛ 46(15): 25-114.
7. Mahmoudi, n., Bahmanpour, h. and Basami, t.Review of the main factors impact students' risk taking. Applied sociology. 2009; 39(2): 56-35. (Persian).
8. کوزه چیان هاشم، گودرزی محمود، خوانین علی، فرزان فرزام . تحلیل ایمنی وتبیین الگوی مربوطه درسالن‌های ورزشی دانشکده های تربیت بدنی .نشریه مدیریت ورزشی،1389؛ 11: 38-119.
9. Conroy, d. Structural validity of the fear of success scale, mes. 2004: 8(2): 89-108.
10. Rodgers, w.m.,Wilson, p.m., hall, c.r., Fraser, s.n. and Murray, t.c. Evidence for a multidimensional self-efficacy for exercise scale, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport .2008; 2: 79-80.
11. Fischhoff, b. Behaviorally realistic risk management, lesson from hurricane Katrina-Philadelphia, university of Pennsylvania, 2006: 77-88.
12. Huang, l., ban, j., sun, k., man, y., yuan, z. and bi, j. The influence of public perception on risk acceptance of the chemical industry and the assistance for risk communication. Journal homepage, safety science. 2013; 51: 232-240.
13. Lu, j., xie, x. and zhan, r. Focusing on appraisals: how and why anger and fear influence driving risk perception, journal of safety research. 2013; 45: 65-73.
14. Karen, d., berukof, f. and grants, m.h. A study of factors that influence the swimming performance of Hispanic high school students, ljare. 2013; 4(4): 409-21.
15. Drace, s. and rice, f. The effect of emotion on risk perception: Experimental evaluations of affective tendencies frame work, psihologija. 2012; 409-16.
16. Moran, k., Stallman, r.k., kjendlie, p.l., dhal, d., Jennifer, d. and shimongata, s. Can you swim, an exploration of measuring real and perceived water competency ijare.2012؛ 6(2):122-135.
17. Apparels, r.n., Levine, b.r., perna, f.m. and rah, j. Measuring post injury depression among male and female competitive athletes. Journal of sport exercise psychology. 2009; 31: 60-76.
18. Llewellyn, d.j. and Sanchez, x. Individual differences and risk taking in rock climbing, psychology of sport and exercise. 2008; 9: 413-26.
19. Knots, a.p., felts,d.l. and marline, r.m. The perception of risk of injury in sports scale: Confirming adolescent athletes’ concerns about injury.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2008; 22 (12).
20. Schneider, s., seither, b., tongues, s. and Schmitt, h. Sports injuries: population based representative data on incidence, diagnosis, sequelae, and high risk groups, journal of sports med. 2006: 40:334-39.
21. Sunho, m. The perception of risk in sport activities, a dissertation submitted to the department of sport management, recreation management physical education. 2004.
22. Rimmo, b.a. and aberg, l. On the distinction between violations and errors sensation seeking associations, transportation research, part F. 1999؛ 2: 151-166.
23. فرزان فرزام. تحلیل ایمنی وتبیین الگوی مربوطه درسالن های ورزشی دانشکده های تربیت بدنی. پایان‌نامه دکترای تخصصی ، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، 1389.
24. بابایی رقیه . رابطه ویژگی‌های شخصیتی با میزان هیجان‌خواهی در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد واحد خلخال، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرج، 1391.
25. قاسمی محمد، محمدزاده حسن، حسینی فاطمه السادات. رابطه خطر پذیری ، خودکارآمدی و عملکرد صخره‌نوردان زن و مرد ایرانی ، پژوهش در علوم ورزشی، 1390 ؛ 10:ص 130-119.
26. Arji, a. Comparing girl students excitement having boyfriends and non-having boyfriend’s in Tehran TTC.The Collection of articles proposed in students mental hygiene seminar in tehran.2008.
27. باقری یزدی هانیه السادات . رابطه سرمایه اجتماعی با خطرپذیری در دانشجویان دانشگاه علامه طبا‌طبایی تهران، نشریه رفاه اجتماعی،1390؛ 11( 41) : 223-250.
28. نجاتی وحید. تصمیم گیری پرخطر درموقعیت های اجتماعی : طراحی آزمون ضمنی و معرفی ویژگی های روان سنجی آن، مجله روان شناسی کاربردی، 1392 ؛ 1(25):101-114.
29. براتی هاجر، عریضی حمیدرضا . رابطه خطرپذیری با عواطف منفی با توجه به گشودگی نسبت به احساسات. مطالعات روان شناختی، 1391؛ 8(71) :31-55.