Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Master of Sports Management, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

2 Professor of Sports Management, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

3 PhD student in Sports Management, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

4 Assistant Professor of Sports Management, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad

5 Assistant Professor of Sports Management, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the effective factors on the virtual education of the general physical education course of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad during the coronavirus. The research is practical in terms of purpose, descriptive in nature and a survey that was conducted in a mixed method (qualitative and quantitative). Data collection tools in this study were library studies, interviews and questionnaires. In the qualitative part of the research, the sample was purposefully selected, and in the quantitative part, among the teachers of physical education and sports and non-physical education students who used the virtual physical education applied program, 323 people were randomly selected as the research sample according to Morgan table. Based on the results of the research, four components of information technology, human resources, motivational and content factors were identified as effective factors in organizing virtual physical education classes. In the meantime, the content component was not in a desirable situation, so the designers of this program should pay more attention to the content factors involved in the program and take corrective measures for the next versions. According to the research results, in order to take advantage of the virtual education system in universities across the country to hold general physical education units, it is necessary to create opportunities for education and conduct studies in universities for the development of information technology, create a culture and a positive attitude towards virtual education, development and use of qualified human resources for the virtual education system, change in the curriculum planning system and physical education course topics as a prerequisite for the transformation of university systems in the use of virtual education programs should be given priority.



Keywords

  1. Akaslan, D., Chong, L., Effie, L. (2010). E-Learning in the science of electricity in higher education in Turkey in terms of environment and Society: Health, Culture and the Environment Conference, 1(1): 1-10.
  2. Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers & Education, 127: 1-12.
  3. Andone, L., Sireteanu, N-A. (2009). Strategies for technology-based learning in higher education. The FedUni Journal of Higher Education, 4(1): 31- 42.
  4. Asadollahi, E., Gholami Bidkhani, R., Jaghargh Mahian, A., & Yazdanian, M. (2020). Research Methods in Physical Education and Sports. Single Book Publications. First Edition. Mashhad. 493. (Persian)
  5. Clark, J. T. (2020). Distance education. Academic Press In Clinical Engineering Handbook. 410-415. ‏
  6. Engelbrecht, E. (2005). Adapting to changing expectations: Postgraduate students experience of an e-learning Tax Program. Computers and Education, 45(2): 217-229.
  7. Erge, Z. L., & Muilenburg, L.Y. (2015). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1): 29-48.
  8. Esmaeilnia, M., Kouhestani, H., Maghul, A. (2019). Design and Validation of quality improvement model of virtual learning in Farhangian University (mixed method). Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 13(2): 561-580. (Persian)
  9. Fathi Vajargah, K., Hasan Pardakhtchi, M., Rabeeyi, M. (2011). Effectiveness Evaluation of Virtual Learning Courses in High Education System of Iran (Case of Ferdowsi University). Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 1(4): 5-21. (Persian)
  10. Ghorbankhani, M., Salehi, K. (2017). Representation Challenges of Virtual Training in Iran's Higher Education System: A Study of Phenomenological Approach. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 7(2(26)): 123-148. (Persian)
  11. Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). "Do institutions cause growth?". Journal of economic Growth, 9(3): 271-303.‏
  12. Jazini, A. (2018). Studying the Effect of E-Learning Courses of Universities and Non-profit Institute on Knowledge Development. Iranian Society for Training and Development, 5(16): 133-150. (Persian)
  13. Jefferson, R. N, & Arnold, L. W. (2009). Effects of virtual education on academic culture perceived advantages and disadvantages. US-China Education Review, 6(3): 61- 66.
  14. Karimian, Z., Farokhi, M. (2018). Eight Steps in the Development of Virtual Education in Educational Innovation Plan in Medical Sciences Universities, A review of an experience. Journal of Medicine and Cultivation, 27(2): 101-112. (Persian)
  15. Kilgore, W. & Aras, B. (2018). Bot-Teachers in Hybrid Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Post- Humanist Experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3): 39–59.
  16. Kiyan, M. (2014). Virtual learning challenges, narrating what the virtual university is not taught. Media, 5(3): 11-22. (Persian)
  17. Menati, H. (2020). Investigation of the effects of COVID-19 on the global economy. Journal of Social Impact Assessment, 1 (2): 163-181. (Persian)
  18. Miliszewska, L., & Rhema, A. (2010). Towards e-learning in higher education in Libya. Informing science and Information Technology, 7(1): 423- 437.
  19. Mohammadkhani, K., Mohammad Davoudi, A., Jalali, A. (2014). Evaluating Factors Influencing Success of Virtual Education in Research Institute of Petroleum Industry. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 5(17): 143-162. (Persian)
  20. Nneka Eke, H. (2011). Modeling LIS students' intention to adopt e-learning: A case from University of Nigeria Nsukka. Nigeria: Library Philosophy and
  21. Norozi Koohdasht, R., Mohammad Davoudi, A. H., & Jafari, P. (2013). Quality of educational services in different schools of sciences & Research University from the students' viewpoints. The 1st National Virtual Conference: Rahavarane Amoozesh. (Persian).
  22. Pandya, K., & Gor, K. (2011). Knowledge management: A success key for higher education. Fed Uni Journal of Higher Education, 5(1): 16- 23.
  23. Rodrigues, M. W., Isotani, S., & Zarate, L. E. (2018). Educational Data Mining: A review of evaluation process in the e-learning. Telematics and Informatics, 35(6): 1701-1717.
  24. Salimi, M., Moslehi, L. (2016). Identifying the Components and Indicators of Evaluating General Physical Education Teachers. Research on Educational Sport, 4(10): 17-34.
  25. Toresdahl, B. G., & Asif, I. M. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): considerations for the competitive athlete. Sports health12(3): 221-224.
  26. Wu, Y.-C., Chen, C.-S., & Chan, Y.-J. (2020). Outbreak of COVID-19: An overview. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 83(3): 217-220.
  27. Zameer, A. (2010). Virtual education system (current myth & future reality in Pakistan. Informing Science and Information Technology, 7(1): 1- 8.