Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Physical Education, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative study was to develop a curriculum design model for an internship course of instruction in physical education major at Farhangian University. In the design of study, triangulation strategy and indicators of credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability were used to increase the trustworthiness of the study findings. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with the beneficiaries of the internship courses (13 supervisor professors, 17 mentor teachers, and 21 student teachers) and content analysis of upstream and transformational documents. The participants were selected using purposeful sampling and the interviews continued until theoretical saturation was reached. After being converted into text, the recorded interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with a comparative approach based on the themes of the basic model (objectives, content, learning activities, and evaluation methods). Open coding and categorization led to the extraction of 59 primary concepts and 11 intermediate themes, which were classified and described in terms of four elements of objectives (cognitive, attitudinal, and behavioral objectives), content (prerequisites, university- and school-based content), learning activities (university- and school-based), and evaluation methods (time, method and reference of evaluation). In addition, the factors affecting the effectiveness of internship courses were identified and discussed based on a sub-question (30 primary concepts in the form of three final themes). The study's findings emphasize the need to reduce the gap between theory and practice, pay attention to the practical needs of teaching in physical education classes, and close cooperation between schools and universities in designing the internship curriculum.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Aghaei, N., Saffari, M., & Hoseini, F. S. (2017). Recognition of professional competence of physical education teachers with grounded theory approach. Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 14, 71-83. (Persian).
  2. Almeida, V. A. R. D., Correa, C. G., & Brum, F. (2020). Supervised physical education curricular internship: The importance of the school's supervisor teacher for training undergraduate. IOSR Journal of Sports and Physical Education, 7(6), 38-43.
  3. Amaral-da-Cunha, M., Graça, A., Batista, P., & MacPhail, A. (2020). Giving birth to a supervisory identity built upon pedagogical perspectives on teaching: The case of a novice physical education cooperating teacher. European Physical Education Review, 26(2), 353-374.
  4. Becker, E. S., Waldis, M., & Staub, F. C. (2019). Advancing student teachers’ learning in the teaching practicum through content-focused coaching: A field experiment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 12-26.
  5. Belton, S., Woods, C., Dunning, C., & Meegan, S. (2010). The evaluation of a cooperating physical education teachers programme (COPET). European Physical Education Review, 16(2), 141–154. 
  6. Borko, H., & Mayfield, V. (1995). The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(5), 501-518.
  7. Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semi-structured interviews: Problems of unitization and inter-coder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294-320.
  8. Clarke, A., Triggs, V., & Nielsen, W. (2014). Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 163-202.
  9. Davis, J. S., & Fantozzi, V. B. (2016). What do student teachers want in mentor teachers? Desired, expected, possible, and emerging roles. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(3), 250-266.
  10. Dicke, T., Elling, J., Schmeck, A., & Leutner, D. (2015). Reducing reality shock: The effects of classroom management skills training on beginning teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 1-12.
  11. Dunning, C., Meegan, S., Woods, C., & Belton, S. J. (2011). The impact of the COPET programme on student PE teachers’ teaching practice experiences. European Physical Education Review, 17(2), 153–165.
  12. Fives, H., Hamman, D., & Olivarez, A. (2007). Does burnout begin with student teaching? Analyzing efficacy, burnout, and support during the student teaching semester. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 916-934.
  13. Farahani, A., Nasr-E-Esfahani, A., & Sharif-Khalif-Soltani, M. (2010). A study method of elementary school teachers training in teacher training center. Technology of Education Journal, 4(4), 287-301. (Persian)
  14. Grudnoff, L. (2011). Rethinking the practicum: Limitations and possibilities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 223-234.
  15. Hascher, T., Cocard, Y., & Moser, P. (2004). Forget about theory - practice is all? Student teachers' learning in practicum. Teachers and Teaching, 10(6), 623-637.
  16. Hodges, C. (1982). Implementing methods: If you can't blame the cooperating teacher who can you blame? Journal of Teacher Education, 33(6), 25-29.
  17. Hoffman, J. V., Wetzel, M. M., Maloch, B., Greeter, E., Taylor, L., DeJulio, S., & Vlach, S. K. (2015). What can we learn from studying the coaching interactions between cooperating teachers and pre-service teachers? A literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 99-112.
  18. Iaochite, R. T., & Costa Filho, R. A. D. (2016). Teacher efficacy beliefs during the practicum experiences in physical education classes. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 22, 183-189.
  19. Iran Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Council for Development and Planning in Higher Education (2022). Curriculum in instruction of physical education. Retrieved from: https://cfu.ac.ir/fa/attach/610233
  20. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2010). Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behavior and teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 98-106.
  21. Kwan, T., & Lopez-Real, F. (2005). Mentors' perceptions of their roles in mentoring student teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 275-287.
  22. Lamb, P., Lane, K., & Aldous, D. (2013). Enhancing the spaces of reflection: A buddy peer-review process within physical education initial teacher education. European Physical Education Review, 19(1), 21–38. 
  23. Lawson, T., Çakmak, M., Gündüz, M., & Busher, H. (2015). Research on teaching practicum: A systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 392-407.
  24. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  25. Martin, S. D., & Dismuke, S. (2018). Investigating differences in teacher practices through a complexity theory lens: the influence of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 22–39.
  26. Martins, M., Costa, J., & Onofre, M. (2015). Practicum experiences as sources of pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 263-279.
  27. Masoumpanah, Z., Tahririan, M., Afzali, K., & Alibabaee, A. (2016). A critical needs analysis of practicum courses at Farhangian University: Mentors and students’ perspectives. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 60-82. (Persian)
  28. Mehrmohammadi, M. (1989). The models of curriculum design. Quarterly Journal of Education, 16, 10-28. (Persian)
  29. Meegan, S., Dunning, C., Belton, S., & Woods, C. (2013). Teaching practice: University supervisors’ experiences and perceptions of a cooperating physical education teacher education programme. European Physical Education Review, 19(2), 199–214.
  30. Mena, J., Hennissen, P., & Loughran, J. (2017). Developing pre-service teachers' professional knowledge of teaching: The influence of mentoring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 47-59.
  31. Moen, K. M., & Standal, Ø. (2016). Practicum in physical education teacher education: An educational partnership? SAGE Open, 6(1), 1-10.
  32. Moen, K. M., & Standal, Ø. F. (2014). Student teachers’ perceptions of the practicum in physical education teacher education in Norway. Nordic Studies in Education, 34, 111-126.
  33. Mordal-Moen, K. M., Green, K. (2012). Physical education teacher education in Norway: The perceptions of student teachers. Sport, Education & Society, 19, 806-823.
  34. Mortazavizadeh, H., & Nasr-Isfahani, A. R. (2017). Studying the problems concerning the internship course from the Farhangian University students' point of view. Journal of Educational Research, 34, 60-74. (Persian)
  35. Natow, R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160-173.
  36. Richter, D., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Klusmann, U., Anders, Y., & Baumert, J. (2013). How different mentoring approaches affect beginning teachers' development in the first years of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 166-177.
  37. Ronfeldt, M., & Reininger, M. (2012). More or better student teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1091-1106.
  38. Saadvandi, M., & Abbasi, E. (2021). Curriculum Design Patterns. Encyclopedia of Technical Education and Training, (1), 324-329. (Persian)
  39. Sato, T., Haegele, J., Saito, M., & Sawae, Y. (2022). The professional socialization of Japanese graduate students during adapted physical education practicum experiences. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(2), 594-608.
  40. Spatz, V., Wilhelm, T., Hopf, M., Waltner, C., & Wiesner, H. (2019). Teachers using a novel curriculum on an introduction to Newtonian mechanics: The effects of a short-term professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(2), 159-178.
  41. Standal, Ø. F., Moen, K. M., & Moe, V. F. (2014). Theory and practice in the context of practicum: The perspectives of Norwegian physical education student teachers. European Physical Education Review, 20(2), 165-178.
  42. Taliaferro, A. R., & Bulger, S. M. (2020). A Delphi study of effective adapted physical education practicum experiences. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 37(1), 20-40.
  43. Tekel, E., Bayır, Ö. Ö., & Dulay, S. (2022). Teaching practicum during the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparison of the practices in different countries. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(2), 71-86
  44. Tolgfors, B., Backman, E., Nyberg, G., & Quennerstedt, M. (2021). Between ideal teaching and ‘what works’: The transmission and transformation of a content area from university to school placements within physical education teacher education. European Physical Education Review, 27(2), 312–327.
  45. Tsuda, E., Wyant, J., Sato, T., & Haegele, J. A. (2019). Pre-service physical education teachers’ practicum experiences teaching PREK children. International Journal of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 3(4), 128-140.
  46. Velija, P., Capel, S., Katene, W., & Hayes, S. (2008). Does knowing stuff like PSHE and citizenship make me a better teacher? Student teachers in the teacher training figuration. European Physical Education Review, 14(3), 389-406.
  47. Yilmaz, I., & Koca, F. (2017). Investigation the effects of field-based practicum experience on pre-service physical education teachers' self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 8(30), 1686-1695.
  48. Zhu, Q., Shen, H., & Chen, A. (2020). Can practicum teaching change pre-service physical education teacher value orientations? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(3), 450-459.