The Effect of University Brand Authenticity on Students' Desire to Participate in University Sports: the Mediating role of University Brand Equity

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Hazrat-e- Masoumeh University

2 Associate Professor of Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

Abstract
Background and Purpose
University sports play an important role in makingstudents’ social lives by fostering team spirit, cooperation, and a sense of belonging within the university community (Martinez et al., 2024). Among the critical factors influencing students’ willingness to engage in sports activities is the university’s brand. A university brand encompasses the unique characteristics and personality traits that distinguish it from other institutions (Stefanica et al., 2024). Central to this concept is brand authenticity, which reflects a positive perception of the brand’s originality, uniqueness, and adherence to core values (Aghaz et al., 2024). For universities, authenticity is perceived through students’ beliefs about the institution’s commitment to quality education, facilities, and student welfare (Florent et al., 2023). Authentic university brands typically provide superior resources such as well-equipped libraries, advanced laboratories, sports facilities, and cultural events (Amani, 2023). This authenticity fosters a positive mindset and enhances the perceived value of the brand (Umer et al., 2021). In turn, university brand equity the added value a brand brings-can significantly influence students’ loyalty and their inclination to participate in university sports activities. A strong brand equity cultivates identity and commitment, motivating students to utilize university resources and engage more deeply with campus life. This study aims to investigate the effect of university brand authenticity on students’ desire to participate in university sports, with a particular focus on the mediating role of university brand equity.
 
Materials and Methods
This quantity study is applied in nature and employs a descriptive-survey design. Data were collected from students at four major universities in Tehran: Tehran University, Tarbiat Modares University, Allameh Tabatabai University, and Shahid Beheshti University. The questionnaire was distributed online via Telegram, Instagram, WhatsApp, and LinkedIn. A total of 500 students responded over ten weeks, with 438 valid responses retained after excluding incomplete questionnaires.
The survey instrument included three constructs measured on a 5-point Likert scale 1 = disagree to 5 = agree: Brand Authenticity: Measured using five items adapted from Azam et al. (2024) and Florent et al. (2023). Brand Equity: Assessed through five items based on Pereira et al. (2022), Pinar et al. (2024), and Amani (2023). Students’ Desire to Participate in Sports: Evaluated using six items from Handi et al. (2022) and Long et al. (2021). Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) via LISREL software to test the hypothesized relationships among the constructs.
 Findings
The analysis revealed that university brand authenticity has a significant positive effect on both brand equity and students’ desire to participate in university sports. Brand equity itself significantly and positively influences students’ willingness to engage in sports activities. Moreover, brand equity was found to mediate the relationship between brand authenticity and students’ sports participation desire, confirming its critical role in this dynamic.
 Conclusion
The results underscore the importance for universities to cultivate and communicate a strong, authentic brand that resonates with students’ values and expectations. Universities should focus on delivering special value through unique sports facilities, exclusive programs, and incentives such as discounts for sports participation. Creating memorable and meaningful experiences tied to the university brand can enhance students’ emotional connection and loyalty. Effective communication strategies, including active engagement on social media, hosting sports events, and recognizing student achievements, can further bolster participation rates. Highlighting success stories of athletes affiliated with the university can inspire confidence and motivate students to participate. Ultimately, universities that invest in brand authenticity and equity can foster a vibrant sports culture, encouraging greater student involvement and strengthening the overall campus community.
Article Message
University brand authenticity serves as a critical factor that significantly influences students’ willingness to participate in sports activities. This influence operates indirectly through the mediating role of the university’s brand equity; specifically, the greater the perceived authenticity of the university, the stronger its brand equity in the minds of students, which in turn leads to an increased inclination toward engagement in university sports. Therefore, universities can enhance student commitment and simultaneously boost participation rates in sports activities by strengthening their institutional identity and brand authenticity.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Aghaz, , Sheikh, A., & Mirzaee, M.(2024). How university teachers’ authenticity and domestic university brand can reduce students’ intention to migrate? Evidence from Iranian higher education institutions, Studies in Higher Education, https://doi.org.10.1080/03075079.2024.2310746
  2. Alwi, S., Che-Ha, N., Nguyen, B., Ghazali, E.M., Mutum, D.M., & Kitchen, P.J. (2020). Projecting university brand image via satisfaction and behavioral response: Perspectives from UK-based Malaysian students. Qualitative Market Research, 23(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-12-2017-0191
  3. Amani, D. (2023). Internal corporate social responsibility and university brand legitimacy: an employee perspective in the higher education sector in Tanzania. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(4), 611-625. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2021-0540
  4. Dongjun, R., Wonsuk, Ch,, Jin-Woo, K., & Joo, Y. J. (2023). The effects of commitment and trust on the relationship between service quality and university brand loyalty in time of crisis, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education,https://doi.org.1080/08841241.2023.2239723
  5. Fahmida, N., & Elsharnouby, T. H. (2021). You are what you communicate: on the relationships among university brand personality, identification, student participation, and citizenship behaviour. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, https://doi.org.1080/08841241.2021.1992814
  6. Florent, G., Inès, B., & Renaud, L. (2023). The role of brand authenticity for higher education institutions, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, https://doi.org.1080/08841241.2023.2172642
  7. Foroudi, P., Yu, Q., Gupta, S., & Foroudi, M.M. (2019). Enhancing university brand image and reputation through customer value co-creation behaviour. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 218-227. https://doi.org.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.006.
  8. France, C., Grace, D., Lo, I.J., & Carlini, J. (2020). Exploring the interplay between customer perceived brand value and customer brand co-creation behaviour dimensions. Journal of Brand Management, 27(4), 466-480.https://doi.org.1057/s41262-020-00194-7
  9. Ghorbanzadeh, D., Rahehagh, A., & Najarzadeh, M. (2024). Determinants of university brand loyalty in an emerging higher education market. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-10-2023-0494
  10. Girard, T., & Pinar, M.(2021). An empirical study of the dynamic relationships between the core and supporting brand equity dimensions in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 710-740. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2020-0097
  11. Hande, K., Petek, T., & Büşra, A. (2022). User-generated and brand-generated content as indicators of university brand personality and business strategy, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education,https://doi.org.1080/08841241.2022.2056281
  12. Ilse, S., & Marius, W. (2022) University brand personality: a student-focused anthropomorphic storytelling perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education,https://doi.org.1080/08841241.2022.2134958
  13. Kaushal, V., & Ali, N. (2020). University reputation, brand attachment and brand personality as antecedents of student loyalty: A study in higher education context. Corp Reputation Rev23, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-019-00084-y
  14. Le, Q.H., Phan Tan, L., & Hoang, T.H. (2023). Brand posts and brand co-creation in higher education communities: a social communication process theory. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1, 1-24. https://doi.org.1080/08841241.2023.2239756
  15. Long Hoang, L., Son Cong, B., Giang Huong, D., & Yung-Chi, Ch. (2021). Understanding the relationships between B2C and C2C value co-creation in the universities: the mediating role of brand awareness. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education,https://doi.org.1080/08841241.2021.2006852
  16. Martínez-Sánchez, S. M., Martínez-Sánchez, L. M., & Martínez-García, C. (2024). Gender differences in barriers to physical exercise among university students studying physical activity and sports sciences. Health Education Journalhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00178969231226383
  17. Martínez-Sánchez, S. M., Martínez-Sánchez, L. M., & Martínez-García, C. (2024). Gender differences in barriers to physical exercise among university students studying physical activity and sports sciences. Health Education Journal, 83(2), 192-204.https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969231226383
  18. Nicola, M., Georgia, A., Emma, B., Daniel, J. P., & Rick, H. (2022). Online learning in higher education in the UK: Exploring the experiences of sports students and staff. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 31, 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2022.100398
  19. Nuseir, M.T., El-Refae, G.A., & Aljumah, A. (2021). The e-Learning of Students and University’s Brand Image (Post COVID-19): How Successfully Al-Ain University Have Embraced the Paradigm Shift in Digital Learning. In Alshurideh, M., Hassanien, A.E., Masa’deh, R. (Eds.), The effect of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on business intelligence: Studies in systems, decision and control (V. 334). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67151-8_10
  20. Perera, C.H., Nayak, R., & Nguyen, L.T.V. (2022). The impact of social media marketing and brand credibility on higher education institutes' brand equity in emerging countries. Journal of Marketing Communications, 1(1), 1-26. https://doi.org.10.1080/13527266.2022.2086284
  21. Pinar, M.Girard, T., & Basfirinci, C.(2020). Examining the relationship between brand equity dimensions and university brand equity: An empirical study in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(7), 1119-1141. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2019-0313
  22. Pinar, M.Trapp, P.Girard, T., & Boyt, T.(2014). University brand equity: an empirical investigation of its dimensions. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(6), 616-634. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2013-0051
  23. Rangel Caballero, L. G., García Mantilla, E. D., Murillo López, A. L., Pérez Bernal, M. A., & Irribarren Llorente, L. L. (2024). Upper-Body Muscular Endurance and Its Association with Aerobic Capacity in University Students of Physical Culture, Sport, and Recreation. MHSalud: Revista En Ciencias Del Movimiento Humano Y Salud, 21(1), e16863https://doi.org/10.15359/mhs.21-1.16863
  24. Saleem, S., Moosa, K., Imam, A., & Khan, R.A.(2017). Service quality and student satisfaction: the moderating role of university culture, reputation and price in education sector of Pakistan. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 1(1), 237-258.
  25. Ștefănică, V., Muntean, R. I., Roșu, D., Ursu, V. E., Gogean Groza, G., & Dragoș, G. C.(2024). Exploring entrepreneurial intention among students in the academic sports domain: A multifaceted examination. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 16(2), 118-137. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.2/849
  26. Tornike, Kh., Davit, D., & Arian, M. (2020). The impact of brand equity dimensions on university reputation: an empirical study of Georgian higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 30(2), 239-255.https://doi.org.1080/08841241.2020.1725955
  27. Umer, Z., Murat, A., Hasnan, B., & Shahid, N. (2021). Does forced-shift to online learning affect university brand image in South Korea? Role of perceived harm and international students’ learning engagement. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education,https://doi.org.1080/08841241.2021.1998285
  28. Vo, T.-T.Le, Q.H.and Duong, L.N.K. (2024). Promoting university brand through student co-creation behaviors: the role of online brand posts. Journal of Trade Science, https://doi.org/10.1108/JTS-11-2023-0026
  29. Walesska, S.,Amparo,  T., & Walter, W. (2023). The influence of university brand image, satisfaction, and university identification on alumni WOM intentions. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 33(1), 1-19. https://doi.org.10.1080/08841241.2021.1874588

 

Volume 12, Issue 36
September 2024
Pages 137-158

  • Receive Date 20 February 2024
  • Revise Date 11 October 2024
  • Accept Date 24 November 2024