Developing a Conceptual Framework of Effective Factors in the Professional Development of Physical Education Teachers with an Emphasis on Psychological Empowerment

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Sports Management ,University of Ivanki , Ivanki, Semnan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor in Physical Education Instruction, Farhangian University, Shahid Chamran Campus, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor in Sport Management, Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Background and Purpose
Physical education (PE) has long been recognized as a foundational pillar of formal education systems across the globe, playing a critical role in nurturing the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of students. The significance of PE extends far beyond the mere acquisition of physical skills; it is instrumental in achieving broader educational objectives and equipping students with competencies essential for lifelong health and success (Salsbili, 2014). However, the effectiveness of physical education programs is inextricably linked to the empowerment and professional development of PE teachers. Experts in the field consistently highlight that effective PE instruction requires educators who are not only skilled and knowledgeable but also psychologically empowered to navigate the complex and dynamic educational landscape (Chen, Xu, Mason et al., 2016).
Central to this discourse is the concept of psychological empowerment, which Zimmerman (1995) defines as a process that involves unlocking individuals’ internal potential by providing opportunities for growth, autonomy, and meaningful engagement. Psychological empowerment has profound implications for teachers, influencing their job satisfaction, organizational commitment, teaching effectiveness, and personal development (Menon, 1999; Spritz, 1995). When teachers experience empowerment, they are more likely to feel confident in their professional competencies, exercise autonomy in decision-making aligned with organizational goals, and pursue meaningful objectives that resonate with their personal and professional aspirations (Matthew & Nair, 2022). These qualities collectively enhance their capacity to create inclusive, engaging, and impactful learning environments that foster student growth and achievement (Safri et al., 2016).
For physical education teachers, empowerment is not merely a desirable attribute but an essential prerequisite for fulfilling their unique role in promoting physical activity, healthy lifestyles, and holistic student well-being (Bassa, Hasti, Rosado et al., 2021). Despite the growing recognition of its importance, there remains a significant gap in the literature regarding systematic approaches to enhancing psychological empowerment among PE teachers. The present study seeks to address this theoretical and practical gap by developing a comprehensive conceptual framework and mechanism model aimed at promoting psychological empowerment in PE teachers. The ultimate goal is to contribute to their professional development and, by extension, to the overall success and sustainability of physical education programs.
 
Materials and Methods
This research adopted an exploratory, applied, and qualitative methodology to construct a robust mechanism model for the psychological empowerment of PE teachers. The study employed semi-structured, in-depth interviews with a targeted sample comprising university-educated specialists, experienced PE teachers, educational experts, and executive directors. The sampling strategy was both purposeful and criteria-based, ensuring a diverse and representative range of perspectives from individuals with substantial expertise in physical education and sports sciences.
Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis, a rigorous qualitative technique involving multiple stages of coding, sorting, and categorization. The analytical process began with the identification of open codes derived from the interview transcripts. These codes were then systematically grouped into sub-themes, which were subsequently organized into broader main themes. This iterative and reflective approach ensured a nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted factors contributing to PE teacher empowerment.
Through this process, a total of eleven sub-themes were identified and organized into four overarching main themes: the nature of psychological empowerment, fundamental factors of empowerment, facilitating factors of empowerment, and the consequences of psychological empowerment.
 
Findings
The study revealed a comprehensive framework for understanding and promoting psychological empowerment among physical education teachers. Psychological empowerment emerged as a multidimensional construct, encompassing several interrelated dimensions that collectively shape teachers’ professional experiences and outcomes.
First, the dimension of self-efficacy was highlighted as a core component, reflecting teachers’ confidence in their ability to perform their professional responsibilities successfully. Closely related to this is the sense of competence, which pertains to teachers’ perceptions of possessing the requisite skills and knowledge necessary for their roles. The dimension of influence was also deemed critical, as it captures teachers’ capacity to impact decision-making processes and outcomes within their schools and educational communities. Finally, the sense of meaningfulness was identified as a vital element, representing teachers’ belief that their work is valuable and aligned with both their personal values and broader professional goals.
The study further identified two fundamental factors that serve as prerequisites for psychological empowerment. The first is teacher characteristics, which include attributes such as professional competence, self-confidence, adaptability, and resilience. These personal qualities enable teachers to navigate challenges and capitalize on opportunities for growth. The second fundamental factor is organizational characteristics, encompassing supportive school cultures, leadership styles that foster collaboration, and institutional policies designed to promote teacher autonomy and professional development.
Facilitating factors were also recognized as crucial enablers of psychological empowerment. Among these, opportunities for professional development were emphasized as essential for continuous skill enhancement and staying abreast of best practices in physical education. The provision of adequate resources and facilities—including teaching materials, infrastructure, and financial support—was identified as another key facilitator. Additionally, executive affairs and school management practices, such as participatory decision-making processes, equitable workload distribution, and administrative policies that prioritize empowerment, were found to significantly influence teachers’ psychological empowerment.
The consequences of psychological empowerment were observed at both the personal and professional levels. On a personal level, empowered teachers reported improved well-being, characterized by better mental health, higher job satisfaction, and a more balanced work-life dynamic. Professionally, psychological empowerment was associated with enhanced teaching effectiveness, enabling teachers to engage students more effectively, foster inclusive learning environments, and adapt instructional methods to meet the diverse needs of students.
Importantly, the findings underscore the interconnected and holistic nature of psychological empowerment. Rather than being a static or one-dimensional process, psychological empowerment arises from the dynamic interplay of individual, organizational, and contextual factors. A comprehensive approach that integrates these dimensions is essential for fostering an environment in which PE teachers can thrive and deliver high-quality instruction.
 
Conclusion
The research concludes that promoting psychological empowerment among physical education teachers requires a systematic and multifaceted approach. Both fundamental and facilitating factors must be addressed in tandem to create a supportive environment where teachers feel empowered to excel in their professional roles. Key recommendations emerging from this study include the design and implementation of targeted professional development programs that focus on enhancing self-efficacy, competence, and autonomy. Establishing supportive organizational cultures that prioritize teacher well-being and engagement is equally important. Providing adequate resources—such as teaching materials, infrastructure, and financial support—ensures that teachers have the tools they need to succeed. Furthermore, fostering collaborative and participatory decision-making processes within schools can strengthen teachers’ sense of influence and ownership over their work.
Psychological empowerment should not be viewed solely as a theoretical construct but as a practical and actionable strategy for improving the quality and sustainability of physical education programs. Empowered teachers are better equipped to inspire and engage students, promote health and wellness, and contribute meaningfully to the broader educational goals of society. This study fills a critical gap in the literature by proposing a conceptual framework and mechanism model for PE teacher empowerment, offering actionable insights for policymakers, educators, and school administrators. By investing in the psychological empowerment of PE teachers, educational systems can unlock their full potential, improve educational outcomes, and pave the way for healthier, more active generations.
Future research should explore the implementation and impact of this framework across diverse educational contexts and refine strategies for teacher empowerment through longitudinal and comparative studies.
 Article Message
This article underscores the pivotal role of psychological empowerment in the professional development of physical education teachers. Through a qualitative research approach, the authors present a comprehensive conceptual framework that identifies the key factors influencing psychological empowerment, including individual attributes, supportive organizational cultures, opportunities for professional development, and the provision of adequate resources. The positive outcomes of empowerment—such as increased job satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, and psychological well-being—are highlighted as essential for achieving high-quality physical education instruction and broader educational goals. The article concludes by recommending that policymakers and educational leaders systematically invest in the psychological empowerment of PE teachers, thereby creating an environment in which they can thrive both professionally and personally.
 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Aartun, I., Walseth, K., Standal, Ø. F., & Kirk, D. (2022). Pedagogies of embodiment in physical education–a literature review. Sport, Education and Society, 27(1), 1–13.
  2. Ahmadi, M., Nazari, S., & Bakhit, M. (2023) The mediating role of learning agility in personal development through psychological empowerment of physical Education teachers. QJOE, 39(2), 49-64
  3. AlkaderMashi, A. M. J. A. A. (2021). Executive attention and its relationship to psychological empowerment among faculty members in some Faculties of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. Modern Sport Journal, 20(1), 232-256.
  4. Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, , Jess, M., Pickup, I., Sandford, R., & Education, B. P. (2009). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: an academic review. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 1-27.
  5. Bessa, C., Hastie, P., Rosado, A., & Mesquita, I. (2021). Sport education and traditional teaching: Influence on students’ empowerment and self-confidence in high school physical education classes. Sustainability, 13(2), 578.
  6. Braga, L., Jones, E., Bulger, S., & Elliott, E. (2017). Empowering teachers to implement innovative content in physical education through continuous professional development. Teacher Development, 21(2), 288–306.
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  8. Butera, F., Batruch, A., Autin, F., Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., & Pulfrey, C. (2021). Teaching as social influence: Empowering teachers to become agents of social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 15(1), 323–355.
  9. Chen, W., Zhu, W., Mason, S., Hammond-Bennett, A., & Colombo-Dougovito, A. (2016). Effectiveness of quality physical education in improving students' manipulative skill competency. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 5(2), 231-238.‏
  10. Feiz, D., Dehghani Soltani, M., Farsizadeh, H., & Ghollamzadeh, R. (2017). Assessing the effect of knowledge sharing on Employees' psychological empowerment by clarifying mediating role of organizational memory and learning collaborative electronic in national library and archives of I.R of Iran. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 32(3), 731-760. (Persian)
  11. George, E., & Zakkariya, K. A. (2018). Psychological empowerment and job satisfaction in the banking sector. Cham: Springer.
  12. Gilliland, H. (2015). The role of the principal in creating a work environment conducive to the psychological empowerment of teachers. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
  13. Girard, S., Desbiens, J. F., & Hogue, A. M. (2023). Effects of a training course on creation of an empowering motivational climate in physical education: A quasi-experimental study. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 28(1), 56-75.
  14. Gonçalves, L. L., Parker, M., Luguetti, C., & Carbinatto, M. (2022). The facilitator’s role in supporting physical education teachers’ empowerment in a professional learning community. Sport, Education and Society, 27(3), 272–285.
  15. Goodarzi, S., Imanzadeh, M., Javid, M., & Amirhosseini, S. E. (2023). Investigating the relationship between professional ethics of physical education teachers and their work engagement with the mediator role of self-efficacy and psychological empowerment. Journal of School Psychology, 11(4), 92-105. (Persian)
  16. Ha, A. S., Wong, A. C., Sum, R. K., & Chan, D. W. (2008). Understanding teachers’ will and capacity to accomplish physical education curriculum reform: The implications for teacher development. Sport, Education and Society, 13(1), 77–95.
  17. Hilts, D., & Liu, (2023). School counselors’ perceived school climate, leadership practice, psychological empowerment, and multicultural competence before and during COVID‐19. Journal of Counseling & Development, 101(2), 193-203.
  18. Kaveh, D., Salajeghe, S., & Sheikhy, A. (2019). Designing and explaining the model of organizational culture in Iran's higher education system and its relationship with psychological empowerment of employees. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 10(39), 293-314. (Persian)
  19. Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2016). On the relationship between psychological empowerment, trust, and Iranian EFL teachers’ job satisfaction: The case of secondary school teachers. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(1), 112-129.
  20. Klein, J. (2016). Teacher empowerment, horizontal and vertical organisational learning, and positional mobility in schools. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 238–252.
  21. Lazarakis, P. (2022). A path forward: Empowering teachers to implement more inclusive special education frameworks in Ontario. University of Toronto (Canada).
  22. Liu, Y., Li, R., Jin, Z., Wu, X., & Wang, W. (2022). Psychological empowerment and professional well-being of Chinese kindergarten teachers: The mediating effect of professional pressure. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 32(1), 7-14.
  23. Llorente-Alonso, M., García-Ael, C., & Topa, G. (2024). A meta-analysis of psychological empowerment: Antecedents, organizational outcomes, and moderating variables. Current Psychology, 43(2), 1759-1784.
  24. López-García, G. D., Granero-Gallegos, A., Carrasco-Poyatos, M., & Burgueño, R. (2023). Detrimental effects of disempowering climates on teaching intention in (physical education) initial teacher education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 878.
  25. Masue, O. S., & Askvik, (2017). Are school committees a source of empowerment? Insights from Tanzania. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(9), 780–791.
  26. Mathew, J., & Nair, S. (2022). Psychological empowerment and job satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Vision, 26(4), 431-440.
  27. Menon, S. T. (1999). Psychological empowerment: Definition, measurement, and validation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du Comportement, 31(3), 161.
  28. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22.
  29. Nazari, S., Eidipour, K., & Bakhit, M. (2022). The effect of relationships based on trust and person-job fit on psychological empowerment and Job retention of sports teachers with the mediator role of person-organization fit. Research on Educational Sport, 9(25), 221-240.
  30. Page, N., & Czuba, C. E. (1999). Empowerment: What is it. Journal of Extension, 37(5), 1–5.
  31. Safari, S., Omidi, A., Sajadi, N., & Khabiri, M. (2016). The relationship of psychological empowerment, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in physical education teachers of iran high schools. Sport Management Journal, 8(1), 1-23. (Persian)
  32. Salsabili, N. (2014) Different interpretations of a national curriculum: A reflection on the Islamic Republic of Iran's Ratified Curriculum. QJOE, 30(2), 63-92. (Persian)
  33. Schermuly, C. C., Creon, L., Gerlach, P., Graßmann, C., & Koch, J. (2022). Leadership styles and psychological empowerment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(1), 73-95.
  34. Shah, T. A., Khattak, M. N., Zolin, R., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2019). Psychological empowerment and employee attitudinal outcomes: The pivotal role of psychological capital. Management Research Review, 42(7), 797-817.
  35. Shahzadeh Teymourlu, H., Khodayari, A., Noorbakhsh, M., & Alidoust Ghahfarokhi, E. (2020). Developing an empowerment model of physical education teachers with emphasis of I.R Iran's 1404 Vision document. Research on Educational Sport, 8(18), 91-112. (Persian)
  36. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
  37. Theron, C. J. (2010). The impact of psychological empowerment and job satisfaction on organizational commitment amongst employees in a multinational organization (Doctoral dissertation). University of the Western Cape).
  38. Tripathi, N., & Bharadwaja, M. (2020). Empowering leadership and psychological health: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 32(3), 97-121.
  39. Tsang, K. K., Du, Y., & Teng, Y. (2022). Transformational leadership, teacher burnout, and psychological empowerment: A mediation analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 50(1), 1–11.
  40. Vem, L. J., Ng, S. I., Sambasivan, M., & Maimako, S. S. (2024). Evaluation of psychological empowerment of academics in innovative pedagogical delivery: The role of inclusive leadership and achievement orientation. Management Research Review, 47(2), 261-280.
  41. Wallhead, T., & O'sullivan, M. (2005). Sport education: Physical education for the new millennium? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(2), 181-210.
  42. Zheng, Y. (2022). Technological empowerment. In Technological empowerment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  43. Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 581-599.

  • Receive Date 03 July 2024
  • Revise Date 24 December 2024
  • Accept Date 03 March 2025