Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

The purpose of present study was to identify components and indicators for evaluation of general physical training teachers. Subjects were all students of Isfahan University (N=12567) from which sample size was calculated as 375 based on Krejcie and Morgan table and subjects were selected randomly based on their sexuality. For data collection, a researcher-made questionnaire, by library studying and using comments of 5 sport management teachers using Delphi method, was utilized. Face and content validity of questionnaire were confirmed by elite’s comments and its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach’s alpha test. For analyzing data from questionnaires, Bartlett test and second time confirmatory factor analysis were used. Findings from factor analysis confirmed the desired value of model and finally the model for evaluation of general physical training teachers including 34 indicators and 5 components, teaching skills (14 indicators), communication skills (5 indicators), personal skills (4 indicators), educational rules and basics (4 indicators), and supervising and evaluation (7 indicators) was designed. The final model and its indicators and components can be used as a comprehensive valid, reliable, student-oriented tool for evaluation of general physical training teachers` performance in universities. 

Keywords

1. Abdolmakeki, j., & Rashidi, z. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Tehran. Sociologists publications. P (51). (Persian)
2. Afzalpour, m., Zerang, m., & Khoshbakhti, j. (2007). Evaluating the implementation of the first and second elementary school physical education course at the base of south Khorasan province. Journal of research in educational sciences, 16, 15. (Persian).
3. Aghamirzaee, t., Salehi-omran, e., & Rahimpour-kami, b. (2014). Effective factors on student evaluation of faculty members’ performance. Bimonthly of education strategies in medical sciences, 7(1), 57-62. (Persian).
4. Arnautu, e., & Panc, i. (2015). Evaluation criteria for performance appraisal of faculty members, procedia - social and behavioral sciences. International conference epc-tks, (203), 386–39
5. Bonyan, a., & Kashef, m. (2004). Surveying content and assessing approaches of general physical education of universities in the country. Research on sport science, 2(5), 15-26. (Persian).
6. Cashin, w. (1995). Student ratings of teaching: the research revisited. Idea paper, 32, 2-9.
7. Cavill, n., Roberts, k., & Rutter, h. (2012). Standard evaluation framework for physical activity interventions. Oxford: national obesity observatory.
8. Dargahi, h., Movahed-kor, e., & Shaham, g. (2009). Studying the views of faculty members and teachers about the evaluating of faculty members by their students. Payavard salamat, 3(1-2), 75-81. (Persian).
9. Fatahi, z., Adhami, a., Nouhi, e., Nakhaei, n., Islami-nezhad, t. (2005). Kerman university of medical sciences` faculty members’ points of view about teachers’ evaluation in the year 2001-2. Hormozgan medical journal, 9(1), 59-66. (Persian).
10. Ghonji, m., Khoshnodifar, z., Hosseini, s.m., & Mazloumzadeh, s.m. (2015). Analysis of some effective teaching quality factors within faculty members of agricultural and natural resources colleges in Tehran university. Journal of the Saudi society of agricultural sciences, 14(2), 109–115. (Persian).
11. Hadavi, f., & Mehdipour, a. (2005). Developing models to evaluate undergraduate physical education and sport sciences of public higher educational institutions. Journal of Olympic, 13(2), 59-73. (Persian).
12. Hammond, l. (2010). Evaluating teacher effectiveness, how teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Center of American progress.
13. Heidari, h., Sharifirad, gh., & Kamran, a. (2013). A comparative study of teacher evaluation priorities from viewpoint of the faculty members and students of Lorestan university of medical sciences. Journal of health system research, 9(7), 749-759. (Persian)
14. Hemati-nezhad, m., Gholizade, m., Ramezanian, m., Mirkazemi, o. (2010). Prioritizing of performance evaluation indicators of physical education departments universities. Research in sport sciences, (27), 127-138. (Persian).
15. Hemati-nezhad, m., Ramezani-nezhad, r., Rezaie, a., Afshar-nejad, t., & Shafie, sh. (2008). Evaluation of evaluation system of physical education teacher performance. Journal of movement, (38), 111-128. (Persian).
16. Hemati-nezhad, m., Ramezani-nezhad, r., Rrezayi, a., & Keivani-borujeni, l. (2009). Comparative investigation on the system of measuring physical education teachers and non-physical education teachers, 2 (continuous, 23). (Persian)
17. Howard, k. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: a brief review. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 23(2), 191-212.
18. Kalani, z., Afshari, f., Sohrabi, z., & Mazloomi, s. (2015). Factors affecting “student evaluations of teaching” from the teachers and students points of view, a comparative study in Shahid Sadughi University of medical sciences, Yazd. Journal of educational development of Jondi Shapur, 6 (1), 18-26. (Persian)
19. Kargar-fard, m. (2007). Organizing assessments of general physical education (2), journal of Olympic, 15 (1). 15-25. (Persian).
20. Karimi, f., Kafi, m., Mousavi, v., Mousavi, h., & Ofoghi, n. (2011). A study of academic staff’s points of view about their evaluation by students. Educ Strateg Med Sci, 4(4), 171-5. (Persian).
21. Khandaghi, a., & Seifi, g. (2013). Capabilities and effective skills required for teaching at universities. Research and planning in higher education, (69), 121-147. (Persian)
22. Kuzmanovic, m., Savic, g., Popovic, m., & Martic, m. (2012). A new approach to evaluation of university teaching considering heterogeneity of students' preferences. Procedia - social and behavioral sciences, 64, 402 – 411.
23. Momeni, m., & Faal-ghaiyoomi, a (2011). Statistical analysis using SPSS. Tehran. Tehran university publications. Third edition. P (177). (Persian)
24. Ranjbar, m., Vahid-shahi, k., & Mahmoodi, m. (2006). The survey of faculty and students attitude of medicine college of medicine university of Mazandaran toward masters evaluation by students. Journal of Mazandaran medicine university. 16. 126- 135. (Persian).
25. Sayar nezhad, j., & Mozafari, a. (2007). Situation of education, human resources, facilities and funding for physical education courses (1 and 2) in units of Islamic Azad university (region 3) from the view point of managers, teachers and students. Journal of movement, (31), 41-56. (Persian).
26. Taherian, t. (2010). Physical education and sport from the perspective of Islam. Journal of development of physical education, (36): 4-7. (Persian).
29. The new teacher project. Teacher evaluation 2.0. (2010); Retrieved at: http://tntp.org/assets/documents/teacher-evaluation-oct10f.pdf. Accessed 2015.
30. Think tank committee on student evaluations) .2015). Considerations in evaluating teaching effectiveness in higher education. A white paper developed by new york university college of dentistry academy of distinguished educators. 4-12.
31. Tojari, f., & Ghatnian, s. (2014). General techniques of teaching methods in sport. Tehran. Hatmi publications.
32. Vakili, a., Hajiaghajani, s., Rashidy-pouar, a., & Ghorbani, r. (2010). An investigation of factors influencing student evaluation of teacher performance: a comprehensive study in Semnan university of medical sciences, a comprehensive study in Semnan university of medical sciences. Koomesh, 12(2), (Persian).
33. Young, s., & Shaw, d. (1999). Profiles of effective college and university teachers. Journal of higher education, 70(6), 670-686.