Research on Educational Sport

Identification and Comparison of Values and Sport Experiences between Iranian Generations

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Ehsan Mohamadi turkmani 1
Hamid Nariman 2
Hossein Khanifar 3

1 Phd of Sport Managment, College of Farabi-Tehran University

2 M.sc Student of strategic management of Sport Organization, PNU south Tehran

3 Professor of Management, College of Farabi-Tehran University

https://doi.org/10.22089/res.2019.6347.1530
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identification and comparison of values and sport experiences between Iranian generations. This study was mixed method and compilation of phenomenological methods, thematic analysis in qualitative and quantitative methods. The thematic analysis of 35 sources identified sports values framework, which was approved by a semi-structured interview with ten experts. Phenomenological interviews were conducted with 40 citizens from four different generations to analyze the differences in sport experiences, which were sampled in this section purposefully and accessible and completed with theoretical saturation. Also, statistical population for analyzing the value differences was all citizens of Tehran, which 384 of them were selected from four generations by stratified random sampling and completed a researcher-made questionnaire based on the results of the thematic analysis. The results showed that there are six groups of Profit-making, Social, Aesthetic, Gender, Health and Global values in the field of sport. There is a significant difference between the generations in profit-making, aesthetic, gender and health values, but there was no significant difference in social and universal values between the four generations. Also, Iranian citizens have experience five categories from sport experience including superior physics, superior spirit, distinction, superior social status, and negative experiences that these experiences were in two broad categories of individual and social experiences. Generally, the positive experiences of sport in the third and fourth generations and negative experiences of it in the first and second generations were more significant.

Keywords

Sport Experience
Iranian Generations
Sport Values
Distinction

Subjects

  1. Aflakifard, H., Mirshah Jafari, S. E., Sadatmand, Z., & Keshti Aray, N. (2013). Abstraction of Intergenerational Education in Curriculum Era: A Qualitative Research. New Approach in Educational Management, 4(15), 217-248. (Persian).
  2. Ahmadi, Y., & Namaki, A. (2013). Democratic Political Culture among Iranian Generations (A Secondary Analysis of the World Values Survey (WVS) for Iran, Its Ethnics and Provinces). Journal of Applied Sociology, 24(3), 131-154. (Persian).
  3. Azizi, B., Jalali Farahani, M., & Khabiri, M. (2011). Survey of the attitudes of students living in university of Tehran dormitories towards sport for all. Journal of Sport Management, 5(3), 75-91. (Persian).
  4. Blazo, J. A., Czech, D. R., Carson, S., & Dees, W. (2014). A qualitative investigation of the sibling sport achievement experience. The Sport Psychologist, 28(1), 36-47.
  5. Bollas, C. (2013). Being a Character: Psychoanalysis and Self Experience. London: Routledge.
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Hasan Chavoshian. Tehran: Sales.
  7. Chitsaz ghomi, M. J. (2007). Recognition of generation concepts and generation gap. Research of Youth, Culture and Society, 1(1), 85-112. (Persian).
  8. Clemes, M. D., Brush, G. J., & Collins, M. J. (2011). Analyzing the professional sport experience: A hierarchical approach. Sport Management Review, 14(4), 370-388.
  9. Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. New York: Oxford University
  10. Danesh, P., Zakeri Nasrabadi, Z., & Abdellahi, A. S. (2014). Sociological Analysis of the Generation Gap in Iran. Sociological Cultural Studies, 5(3), 1-30. (Persian).
  11. Ebben, W., & Brudzynski, L. (2008). MOTIVATIONS AND BARRIERS TO EXERCISE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, 11 (5), 1-11.
  12. Eyvazi, G. (2015). Sociological Study of the Generation Gap in Iran after the Islamic Revolution with Emphasis on Cultural Elements of the Iranian Identity. Journal of Islam and Social Studies, 3(11), 90-120. (Persian).
  13. Fry, M. D., & Lori, G.-O. (2010). Exploring the contribution of the caring climate to the youth sport experience. Journal of applied sport psychology, 22(3), 294-304.
  14. Heravi Karimloo, M., Anoosheh, M., Foroughan, M., Sheykhi, M. T., Hajizade, E., Seyed Bagher Maddah, M. S., Ahmadi, F. (2008). Loneliness from the Perspectives of Elderly People: A Phenomenological Study. Iranian Journal of Ageing, 2(4), 410-420. (Persian).
  15. Jafarzadeh Pour, f. (2017). Media, a tool for Generations Classification in Iran. Sociological Cultural Studies, 8(2), 1-17. (Persian)
  16. Jajarmi, k. (1999). Young generation: New generation structural features. Tehran: Asian Studies Foundation. (Persian).
  17. Kafashi, M. (2015). A Survey on Effective Social and Cultural Factors in Generation Gap in Tehran. Quarterly journal OF Women & Society, 6(21), 67-86. (Persian).
  18. Khanifar, H., & Moslemi, N. (2017). Principles and foundations of qualitative research methods. Tehran: Negah Danesh. (Persian).
  19. Kosari, M. (2008). Generations of X, Y and Z and Cultural Policy in Iran. Strategy for Culture (3), 65-84. (Persian).
Research on Educational Sport
Volume 7, Issue 17
October 2019
Pages 159-186

  • Receive Date 03 September 2018
  • Revise Date 30 January 2019
  • Accept Date 03 February 2019

Home

Publication Ethics

Submit Manuscript

News

Journal Metrics

Contact Us