Research on Educational Sport

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Reviewers

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Article Processing Charges (APC)

Terms and conditions for manuscript submission

Submission Instruction

Forms

Peer Review Process

Prioritize the approaches and methods of teaching Olympism in schools using the fuzzy Delphi and TOPSIS method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Sports Management, Faculty of physical education and Sport science, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor in Sport Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor in Sport Management, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Objective of present study is prioritizing Olympism education approaches regarding cultural and educational criteria of our country. Regarding method, this study is descriptive-analytical and regarding purpose, is practical study. First of all; for determining the criteria of study, fuzzy Delphi method and then the TOPSIS method were used to weighting teachers' opinion. The study population included two groups: 15 physical education experts that have research experience on Olympic, and 300 physical education teachers. Five criteria included knowledge resources, cultural factor, financial resource, efficiency and hardware equipment selected by experts as important criteria. And regarding these criteria's, life based approach that weighted 0/804 was the most important approach and experience based approach that weighted 0/733 was less important than other approach. Between educational methods, combination of values with social challenge of students and educating social issues by using athletes' experiences had higher priority. Regarding that Olympic education is a new issue in the world, knowledge resources was the most important criteria to choose educational approaches and method. Life based approach was first priority that show the great need to change traditional education system and become more relevant with modern education systems. Also combination of social life with Olympism education and physical education make the educational method more efficient.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
  1. Akyuz, E., Celik, E. (2015). A fuzzy DEMATEL method to evaluate critical operational hazards during gas freeing process in crude oil tankers. Journal of LossPrevention in the Process Industries. 38: 243-253.
  2. Alizadeh, V., Ahmadi, M., Ahadi, B. (2016). Influencing Factors on tendency of primary school physical education teachers to use instructional media in the teaching process. Applied Research of Sport Management. 5(2): 45-52. (Persian)
  3. Armourand, K.M., Yelling, M. (2004). Professional e-development and professional e-learning: Bridging the gap for experienced physical education teachers. European Physical Education Review. 10(1): 71-93.
  4. Bindah, E.V. (2019). Adoption of snowball sampling technique in an exploratory study of disabled entrepreneurship. SAGE Publications Ltd. P: 77-83.
  5. Binder, D.L. (2001). “Olympism” revisited as context for global education: Implications for physical education. Quest 53. 1: 14-34.
  6. Binder, D.L. (2007). Teaching values: An Olympic education toolkit. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee. P. 121-128.
  7. Binder, D.L. (2005). Teaching Olympism in Schools: Olympic Education as a focus on Values Education. Centre d’Estudis Olimpics. 5-16. Web site: http://olympicstudies.uab.es/lectures/
  8. Binder, D.L. (2012): Olympic values education: evolution of pedagogy. Educational Review. 64(3): 275-302.
  9. Bronikowski, M. (2007). A Critical Review of Cognitive, Visual, Arts and Kinetic Methods of Teaching in Olympic Pedagogy. 9th International Session for Directors of National Olympic Academies. P. 227-332.
  10. Chatziefstathiou, D. (2012). Olympic education and beyond: Olympism and value legacies from the Olympic and Paralympic Games, Educational Review. 64(3): 385-400.
  11. Chen, S., Henry, I. (2019). Schools’ engagement with the Get Set London 2012 Olympic education programme: Empirical insights from schools in a non-hosting region. European Physical Education Review. 25(1): 254-272.
  12. Corral, C.D., Perez-Turpin, J.A., Vidal, A.M. (2010). Principles of the Olympic movement. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 5: 3-14.
  13. Culpan, I. (2018). Olympism, physical education and critical pedagogy. European Physical Education Review: 1356336-18782560.
  14. D'Oria, A. (2004). How I improved my teaching practice in grade 9 boys' physical education to increase students' participation and enjoyment (Doctoral dissertation, Nipissing University, Faculty of Education).
  15. Geoffery, Z.K., Will, B.J. (2015). Rhetoric and realities of London 2012 Olympic education and participation ‘legacies’: voices from the core and periphery.Sport, Education and Society. 10: 1080-1091.
  16. Ghafouri, F., Mirzayi, B., Honari, H., Honarvar, A. (2008). The impact of Olympic education on student attitudes across universities. Olympics Journal. 16(41): 71-77. (Persian).
  17. Grammatikopoulos, V., Hassandra, M. (2005). Evaluating the  olympic education program: a qualitative. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 31: 347-357.
  18. Grisham, T. (2009). The Delphi technique: a method for testing complex and multifaceted topics. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 2(1): 112-130.
  19. Gupta, B. (2011). Olympsm and Indian Society: Complementary or Supplementary. 9th International Session for Educators and Officials of Higher Institutes of Physical Education. P. 420-423.
  20. Habibi, A., Jahantigh, F.F., Sarafrazi, A. (2015). Fuzzy delphi technique for forecasting and screening items. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management. 5(2): 130-143.
  21. Hassandra, M., Goudas, M., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Theodorak, Y. (2001). A fair play intervention program in school Olympic education. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 5: 99-111.
  22. Honari, H. (2018). Designing a model for the physical education teachers’ professional characteristics and competencies. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 3(19): 55-68.
  23. Hosseini, S.M.H., Dehghanedehnavi, M.A, Ghorbanzadeh, V, Amiri, M, Rajaeebaghsiaee, M. (2018). Explaining factor model affecting iranian bank credits using fuzzy delphi approach. Finnancial Management Perspective Journal. 21: 115-131.
  24. International Olympic Committee (IOC). (2011). Olympic Charter. Lausanne: IOC. P. 50-52.
  25. Kim, M., Jang, Y.C., Lee, S. (2013). Application of Delphi-AHP methods to select the priorities of WEEE for recycling in a waste management decision-making tool. Journal of Environmental Management. 128: 941-948.
  26. Knijnik, J., Tavares, O. (2012). Educating Copacabana: A critical analysis of the "Second Half", an Olympic Education program of Rio 2016. Educational Review. 64: 353-368.
  27. Malek-Akhlagh, E., Dorostkar-Ahmadi, N., Mehdizadeh, M., Akhavan-Tavakoli, N. (2014). Determination of the basic criteria for selecting a coach by using the Fuzzy Delphi method and selecting the best coach using the developed Topsis technique (Case Study: Damash Sports Club in Guilan). Management and Development of Sports Journal. 3(2): 105-128. (Persian).
  28. Miller, G. (2001). The development of indicators for sustainable tourism: results of a Delphi survey of tourism researchers. Tourism Management. 22(4): 351-362.
  29. Momeni, M. (2013). New research topics in operations. Ganj Shayegan Publishing House, Tehran. P. 120-126. (Persian).
  30. Mongpraneet, S. (2011). Power of Sport. 9th international Session for Educators and Officials of Higher Institutes of Physical Education. P. 331-336.
  31. Mousavi, P., Yousefi, R., HasanPour, A. (2015). Identification of information security risks using the Fuzzy Delphi method in the banking industry. Information Technology Management Journal. 7(1): 163-184. (Persian).
  32. Naul, R. (2012). Olympic education. Translation: Hamidi, M., Jafari, M. Tehran: Publications of Physical Education Research Institute of Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. P. 43-45. (Persian).
  33. Naul, R. (2007). Olympic education. Oxford: Meyer & Meyer. P. 117-119. Naul, R. (2008). Olympic pedagogy as a theory of development of ethical and humanistic values in education. Sporto Mokslas. 3: 9-15.
  34. Parry, J. (2003). Olympic education in practice. Proceedings of the 3rd National Congress of Olympism and Sports Culture, University of Ulusal, Bursa, Turkey. 164-74.
  35. Parry, J. (2006). Sport and Olympism: Universals and Multiculturalism. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 33: 188-204.
  36. Petrie, K. (2017). Olympic/ism Education: Does it have a place in Physical Education?. International Academic Journal on Olympic Studies. 1: 153-168.
  37. Raste-Moghadam, A., Naderi, A. (2015). Patterns of funding and extraction of teachings for Iran's higher education system. Iranian Higher Education Journal. 7(2): 113-152. (Persian).
  38. Rodichenko, V.S. (2005). Olympic education in Russia. Fizkultura I Sport Publishers. Moscow.
  39. Saadabadi, A.A., Taleghani, G.R., Golchin, A. (2013). Identifying and investigating teamwork barriers in Iranian knowledge-based organizations and Tehran University of Science and Technology Parks through fuzzy approach. Management, Economics & Accounting, Public Organization Management. 1(3): 65-82.
  40. Sabouri-KhosroShahi, H. (2010). Education in the era of globalization; Challenges and strategies to deal with it. Globalization Strategic Studies Journal. 1(1): 153-196. (Persian).
  41. Safari Jafarloo, H.R. (2018). Developing the promotion strategies and proper content of olympic education among students of Iranian schools. Research on Educational Sport Journal. 6(14): 327-44. (Persian).
  42. Sagarzazu, I. (2011). Olympic Education: A bridge between sport, cultural diversity and development. 9th International Session for Educators and Officials of Higher Institutes of Physical Education. P. 111-115.
  43. Sajjadi, N. (2006). Meet the Olympic Movement. Tehran: National Olympic Committee Publications. P. 23-30. (Persian).
  44. Sukys, S., Majauskiene, D., Dumciene, A. (2017). The effects of a three-year integrated Olympic education programme on adolescents’ prosocial behaviours. European Journal of Sport Science. 17(3): 335-342.
  45. Wang, Y., Masumoto, N. (2009). Olympic Education at Model Schools for the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. International Journal of Sport and Health Science. 7: 31-41.
  46. Wilson, F.R., Pan, W., Schumsky, D.A. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development. 45(3): 197-210.
  47. Wu, G.D., Liao, S.K., Chiu, C.H., Chang, K.L. (2013). New product development projects selection for Taiwanese century-old businesses. Life Science Journal. 10(3): 1152-1161.
  48. Zohrevandian, K., Sajjadi, S.N., Khosravizadeh, E., Ebrahimi, F. (2018). A study of the amount of attention to sport and olympic education in textbooks of primary schools. Sport Management Journal of Tehran University. 10(1): 65-84. (Persian).
Research on Educational Sport
Volume 7, Issue 17
October 2019
Pages 305-328
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 21 April 2019
  • Revise Date: 12 July 2019
  • Accept Date: 24 July 2019
Share
How to cite
Statistics