Research on Educational Sport

Effect of Need-Supportive Environment on Sport Performance of Primary School Students

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. candidate of Motor Behavior, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Professor of Motor Behavior, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of need-supportive teaching style on students’ sport performance, and compared to usual teaching style. Two hundred and eight male and female students at the fifth and sixth grades (Mage =11/58) selected by available sampling method in badminton and volleyball and they were delivered need-supportive (experimental group 1) and usual (experimental group 2) teaching styles. In the experimental group 1, teachers taught motor skills according to either the constraints-led approach or need-supportive style. In the experimental group 2, teachers taught based on teachers’ usual teaching style. Motor skills were measured in pre-test and post-test stages based on previous research. Game performance was measured through the game-play performance index (GPAI) in the transfer test. The results showed that motor skills were promoted in either need-supportive or typical teaching styles in both sports. However, compared to the typical teaching style, only serve skill in volleyball was higher in the need-supportive teaching style. Overall, game-performance was higher in need-supportive teaching style. Findings supported either the study hypothesized and the self-determination theory preposition in the elementary physical education context. This study also shows that need-supportive teaching style is an appropriate approach in promoting game-play performance.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Ahamdi, M. (2011). Percieved motivational climates on self-determined motivation and volleyball skills learning. PhD Dissertation, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Tehran Branch.
  2. SHAPE America. (2014). National standards & grade-level outcomes for K-12 physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  3. Behzadnia, B., Adachi, P. J., Deci, E. L., & Mohammadzadeh, H. (2018). Associations between students' perceptions of physical education teachers' interpersonal styles and students' wellness, knowledge, performance, and intentions to persist at physical activity: A self-determination theory approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 39, 10-19.
  4. Behzadnia. B., Ahmadi. M., & Amani. J. (2017). The factorial structure of the Self-Regulation Questionnaire in College Physical Education Class (SRQ-PE). Research on Sport Management and Motor Behavior. 7 (13) : 25-34.
  5. Behzadnia. B., Mohammadzadeh. H., & Ahmadi. M. (2017). Autonomy-supportive behaviors promote autonomous motivation, knowledge structures, motor skills learning and performance in physical education. Current Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9727-0
  6. Chen. B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers. W., Boone, L., Deci. E. L., Van der Kaap-deeder, J.,   Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2),216-236
  7. Cheon. S. H, Reeve. J & Ntoumanis.N. (2018). A needs-supportive intervention to help PE teachers enhance students' prosocial behavior and diminish antisocial behavior.  Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 35, 74-88.
  8. Cheon.s.h & Reeve.j, Moon.i.s. (2012). Experimentallybased, longitudinaly designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy-supportive toward their students. jornal of sport and Exercise psychology,34(3),365-396
  9. Chow. J. Y., Davids. K., & Button.C. (2015). Nonlinear pedagogy in skill acquisition: An introduction. Florence: Routledge.
  10. Davids. K, Button. C & Bennett. S.J. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach: Illinois, Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  11. Deci. E. L & Ryan. R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
  12. Deci. E. L & Ryan. R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15327965pli1104_01.
  13. Deci. E. L, Vallerand. R. J, Pelletier. L. G & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346
  14. Franco, E., & Coterón, J. (2017). The effects of a physical education intervention to support the satisfaction of basic psychological needs on the motivation and intentions to be physically active. Journal of Human Kinetics, 59(1), 5-15.                                               
  15. Gibson. J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Boston: Houghton-Mifihin.
  16. Gray. L & Leyland. A. H. (2008). Overweight status and psychological well-being in adolescent boys and girls: a multilevel analysis. The European Journal of Public Health, 18(6), 616-621
  17. Gréhaigne. J, Richard. J & Griffin. L.L. (2005). Teaching and learningteam sports and games: New York: Routledge.
  18. Haerens. L, Aelterman. N, Vansteenkiste. M, Soenens. B. & Van Petegem.S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy- supportive   and controlling teaching relate to physical education students' motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation.  Psychology of Sport andExercise, 16, 26–36.
  19. Hein. V, Müür. M & Koka. A. (2004). Intention to be physically active after school graduation and its relationship to three types of intrinsic motivation. European Physical Education Review, 10(1), 5-19
  20. Hooyman. A, Wulf. G & Lewthwaite. R. (2014). Impacts of autonomy supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning. Human Movement Science, 36, 190–198
  21. Kelso. J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  22. Lee. M. C, Chow.J. Y, Komar. J, Tan. C. W & Button. C. (2014). Nonlinear pedagogy: an effective approach to Cater for individual differences in learning a sports skill.  PLoS One, 9(8), e104744.   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104744.
  23. Mitchel. S. A & Oslin. L. (2006). An investigation of tactical transfer in net games. European Jornal of Physical Education, 4(2), 162-172. Doi:10.1080/1740898990040205
  24. Moy.B, Renshaw.I & Davids. K. (2015). The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 517–538.   https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1072506.
  25. Newell.K.M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341–360). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff
  26. Ryan. R. M & Deci. E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologists, 55(1), 68–78.
  27. Ryan.R. M & Deci. E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. New York: Guilford.
  28. Standage. M & Ryan. R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory and exercise motivation: Facilitating self-regulatory processes to support and maintain health and well-being. In G. C. Roberts & D. C. Treasure (Eds.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 233-270). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
  29. Sun. H & Chen. A. (2010). An examination of sixth graders’ self-determined motivation and learning in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29(3), 262-277
  30. Vansteenkiste. M, Simons. J, Lens. W, Sheldon. K. M & Deci. E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(2), 246
  31. Verloigne. M, Van Lippevelde. W, Maes. L, Yıldırım. M, Chinapaw. M, Manios.Y, & De Bourdeaudhuij. I. (2012). Levels of physical activity and sedentary time among 10-to 12-year-old boys and girls across 5 European countries using accelerometers: an observational study within the ENERGY-project. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 34
  32. Wulf, G., Iwatsuki, T., Machin, B., Kellogg, J., Copeland, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2018). Lassoing skill through learner choice. Journal of motor behavior, 50(3), 285-292.
Research on Educational Sport
Volume 7, Issue 17
October 2019
Pages 329-352

  • Receive Date 24 June 2018
  • Revise Date 21 October 2018
  • Accept Date 29 October 2018

Home

Publication Ethics

Submit Manuscript

News

Journal Metrics

Contact Us