پژوهش در ورزش تربیتی

تأثیر الگو "تدریس بازی برای فهمیدن" بر سواد جسمانی پسران ده ساله

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجو دکتری رشد حرکتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی

2 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی اصفهان واحد خوراسگان

چکیده
هدف از انجام این پژوهش بررسی تأثیر الگو "تدریس بازی برای فهمیدن" بر سواد جسمانی و حوزه­های زیر مجموعه آن بوده است. بدین منظور دانش­آموزان دو کلاس چهارم (میانگین سنی7/0±2/10سال) در یک مدرسه در شهر سیرجان به طور تصادفی در دو گروه کنترل و تجربی قرار گرفتند (هر گروه 22 نفر). در مرحله اول از کلیه دانش آموزان شرکت­کننده تست ارزیابی کانادایی سواد جسمانی نسخه دوم گرفته شد و گروه تجربی در یک دوره مداخله با الگو "تدریس بازی برای فهمیدن" به مدت 36 جلسه و هر جلسه 45 دقیقه شرکت کردند و گروه کنترل برنامه کلاسی همیشگی خود را انجام دادند. سپس ارزیابی سواد جسمانی برای بار دوم در پایان مداخله برای هر دو گروه انجام شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها از آزمون تک متغیره من ویتنی برای مقایسه نمره­های هر فاکتور بعد از مداخله استفاده شد و همچنین برای بررسی گروه­های مطالعه با حذف اثر هر فاکتور قبل از مداخله با توجه به نوع مقیاس از آزمون­های چند متغیره آنالیز کواریانس و یا آنالیز رگرسیون پواسن با استفاده از روش "جی.ای.ای" در سطح معناداری (05/0P≤) استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد این الگو تأثیر معناداری بر سواد جسمانی، رفتار روزمره، درک و فهم و انگیزه و اعتماد به نفس دارد، اما تفاوت معناداری بر توانمندی جسمانی مشاهده نشد. این نتایج حمایت از این فرضیه را فراهم می­کنند که استفاده از این الگو می­تواند در تسهیل رشد مؤلفه‌های سواد جسمانی کودکان مؤثر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

  1.  

    1. Alcalá, D. H., & Garijo, A. H. (2017). Teaching games for understanding: A comprehensive approach to promote student’s motivation in physical education. Journal of human kinetics, 59(1): 17-27.‏
    2. Almond, L. (2013). What is the value of physical literacy and why is physical literacy valuable?.Presidents Message,‏
    3. America, S. H. A. P. E., Couturier, L., Chepko, S., & Holt, S. A. (2014). National standards & grade-level outcomes for K-12 physical education. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
    4. ‏Bailey, P., Hunsberger, M., & Hayden, K. A. (1998). The diverse faces of critical literacy: Only knowledge or also social action?. Alberta journal of educational research, 44(2): 120.‏
    5. Balakrishnan, M., Rengasamy, S., & Aman, M. S. (2011). Effect of teaching games for understanding approach on students' cognitive learning outcome. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 5(5), 714-716‏
    6. Capel, S., & Whitehead, M. (2013). Debates in physical education. Routledge, , London , pp. 3-21‏.
    7. Castelli, D. M., Centeio, E. E., Beighle, A. E., Carson, R. L., & Nicksic, H. M. (2014). Physical literacy and comprehensive school physical activity programs. Preventive medicine, 66: 95-100.‏

     

     

    1. Cocca, A., Espino Verdugo, F., Ródenas Cuenca, L. T., & Cocca, M. (2020). Effect of a Game-Based Physical Education Program on Physical Fitness and Mental Health in Elementary School Children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13): 4883.‏
    2. Dania, A., Kossyva, I., & Zounhia, K. (2017). EFFECTS OF A TEACHING GAMES FOR UNDERSTANDING PROGRAM ON PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS'PHYSICAL ACTIVITY PATTERNS. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 3(2), 81-94.
    3. Davids, K., Hristovski, R., Araújo, D., Balague-Serre, N., Button, C., & Passos, P. (Eds). (2014). Complex systems in sport. London: Routledge.
    4. Doozan, A., & Bae, M. (2016). Teaching physical literacy to promote healthy lives: TGfU and related approaches. The Physical Educator, 73: 471-487.
    5. Dudley, D. A. (2015). A conceptual model of observed physical literacy. The Physical Educator, 72: 236-260.
    6. Fawkner, S., Henretty, J., Knowles, A. M., Nevill, A., & Niven, A. (2014). The influence of maturation, body size and physical self-perceptions on longitudinal changes in physical activity in adolescent girls. Journal of sports sciences, 32(4): 392-401.‏
    7. Fletcher, T., & Bullock, S. M. (2012). Enacting literacy pedagogies: A collaborative self-study by teacher educators in physical education and science. Studying Teacher Education, 8: 19-33.
    8. Fu, Y., Gao, Z., Hannon, J. C., Burns, R. D., & Brusseau, T. A. (2016). Effect of the SPARK program on physical activity, cardiorespiratory endurance, and motivation in middle-school students. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 13(5): 534-542.
    9. Gabbett, T., Jenkins, D., & Abernethy, B. (2009). Game-based training for improving skill and physical fitness in team sport athletes. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4(2): 273-283.‏
    10. Green, N. R., Roberts, W. M., Sheehan, D., & Keegan, R. J. (2018). Charting physical literacy journeys within physical education settings. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(3): 272-279.‏
    11. Griffin L., Oslin J.L., Mitchell S.A. (1995). An analysis of two instructional approaches to teaching net games. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66: 65–66.
    12. Harvey, S., Cushion, C. J., Wegis, H. M., & Massa-Gonzalez, A. N. (2010). Teaching games for understanding in American high-school soccer: A quantitative data analysis using the game performance assessment instrument. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(1): 29-54.‏
    13. Harvey, S., & Jarrett, K. (2014). A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(3): 278-300.‏
    14. Harvey, S., Song, Y., Baek, J. H., & Van Der Mars, H. (2016). Two sides of the same coin: Student physical activity levels during a game-centred soccer unit. European Physical Education Review, 22(4): 411-429.
    15. Jurbala, P. (2015). What is physical literacy, really? Quest, 67: 367-383.
    16. Light, R. (2002). Engaging the body in learning: promoting cognition in games through TGfU. ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal, 49(2): 23-26.
    17. Longmuir, P. E., Boyer, C., Lloyd, M., Yang, Y., Boiarskaia, E., Zhu, W., & Tremblay, M. S. (2015). The Canadian assessment of physical literacy: methods for children in grades 4 to 6 (8 to 12 years). BMC public health, 15(1): 767.‏
    18. Mandigo, J., Lodewyk, K., & Tredway, J. (2019). Examining the Impact of a Teaching Games for Understanding Approach on the Development of Physical Literacy Using the Passport for Life Assessment Tool. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 38(2): 136-145.‏
    19. Oslin JL, Mitchell SA. 2006. Game-centered approaches to teaching physical education.In: O’Sullivan M, Kirk D, Macdonald D, eds. Handbook of physical education. Champaign: Human Kinetics. 627-650.
    20. Osman, A. S. H. R. A. F. (2017). Effects of teaching games for understanding on tactical awareness and decision making in soccer for college students. Ovidius University Annals, Series Physical Education and Sport/Science, Movement and Health, 17(2): 170-177.‏
    21. Pearson, P. J., & Webb, P. (2008). Developing effective questioning in teaching games for understanding (TGfU).‏ Paper presented at the 1st Asia Pacific sport in education conference, Adelaide
    22. Pasek, M., Szark-Eckardt, M., Wilk, B., Zuzda, J., Żukowska, H., Opanowska, M., ... & Kupcewicz, E. (2020). Physical Fitness as Part of the Health and Well-Being of Students Participating in Physical Education Lessons Indoors and Outdoors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1): 309.‏
    23. Penney, D., & Chandler, T. (2000). Physical education: What future (s)?. Sport, Education and Society, 5(1): 71-87.‏
    24. Renshaw, I., Araújo, D., Button, C., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Moy, B. (2016). Why the constraints-led approach is not teaching games for understanding: A clarification. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5): 459-480.
    25. Roberts, S., & Fairclough, S. (2011). Observational analysis of student activity modes, lesson contexts and teacher interactions during games classes in high school (11—16 years) physical education. European Physical Education Review, 17(2): 255-268.‏
    26. Rovegno, I., & Dolly, J. P. (2006). 3.4 Constructivist perspectives on learning. Handbook of physical education, 242.‏
    27. Santos-Rocha, R., Rieger, T., & Jimenez, A. (2015). Europe Active’s Essentials of Fitness Instruction.  Campaign: Human Kinetics. ‏
    28. Slingerland, M., Haerens, L., Cardon, G., & Borghouts, L. (2014). Differences in perceived competence and physical activity levels during single-gender modified basketball game play in middle school physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20(1): 20-35.
    29. Thorpe, R., Bunker, D., & Almond, L. (1986). Rethinking games teaching. Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Technology.
    30. Trajković, N., Madić, D. M., Milanović, Z., Mačak, D., Padulo, J., Krustrup, P., & Chamari, K. (2020). Eight months of school-based soccer improves physical fitness and reduces aggression in high-school children. Biology of Sport, 37(2): 185.‏
    31. Trudeau, F., & Shephard, R. J. (2008). Physical education, school physical activity, school sports and academic performance. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5(1): 10.‏
    32. Webb, P. I., Pearson, P. J., & Forrest, G. (2006). Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) in primary and secondary physical education.‏ International Conference for Health, Physical Education Recreation, Sport and Dance, 1st Oceanic Congress Wellington. New Zealand.
    33. Whitehead, M. (2007). Physical literacy: Philosophical considerations in relation to developing a sense of self, universality and propositional knowledge. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 1(3): 281–298.
    34. Whitehead, M. (Ed.). (2010). Physical literacy: Throughout the lifecourse. New York, NY: Routledge.
    35. Whitehead, M. (2013). What is physical literacy and how does it impact on physical education. Debates in physical education, 37-52.‏
    36. Yu, C. C. W., Chan, S., Cheng, F., Sung, R. Y. T., & Hau, K. T. (2006). Are physical activity and academic performance compatible? Academic achievement, conduct, physical activity and self‐esteem of Hong Kong Chinese primary school children. Educational Studies, 32(4): 331-341.‏

  • تاریخ دریافت 17 تیر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری 03 مهر 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش 07 مهر 1400

صفحه اصلی

اصول اخلاقی

ارسال مقاله

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما