نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی رشته برنامه ریزی درسی ، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران،ایران

2 دانشیارگروه برنامه ریزی درسی ،دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی ، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران(نویسنده مسئول) Javadipour@ut.ac.ir

3 دانشیارگروه مدیریت فرهنگی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

4 استادیارگروه تربیت بدنی، واحد بوئین زهرا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بوئین زهرا، ایران

چکیده

هدف از انجام پژوهش شناسایی عناصر برنامه درسی آموزش تربیت بدنی با یادگیری ترکیبی بوده است. پژوهش از نوع کیفی بود که به روش فراترکیب انجام شد. منبع داده‏های پژوهش مطالعات انجام گرفته در زمینه تربیت بدنی با رویکرد یادگیری ترکیبی در سال‏های 2020 تا 2023 بود که با جستجو، بررسی و انتخاب پژوهش‏ها در حوزه تربیت بدنی با رویکرد یادگیری ترکیبی از پایگاه‏های علمی، در نهایت 28 مقاله به‏منظور تحلیل نهایی انتخاب شد. نتایج و محتوای پژوهش‏ها با استفاده از تکنیک تحلیل محتوا و کدگذاری تحلیل شدند که در نهایت 11 کد محوری به‌عنوان عناصر برنامه درسی آموزش تربیت بدنی با یادگیری ترکیبی شناسایی شدند. این عناصر عبارتنداز: 1-اصول پداگوژیکی یادگیری ترکیبی در تربیت بدنی، 2-برنامه درسی، طراحی آموزشی و روش‏ها، 3-محتوا و ویژگی‏های آن، 4-مهارت، شایستگی و توسعه حرفه‏ای معلمان، 5-نقش معلم/ مربی، 6-مولفه‏های روانشناختی، 7-تعامل، ارتباطات و مشارکت (مسائل اجتماعی یادگیری)، 8-مسائل حقوقی و نهادی 9-عدالت آموزشی، 10-ارزشیابی، 11-زیرساخت، تجهیزات و پشتیبانی. یافته‌های این مطالعه مبتنی بر ترکیبی از یافته‌های مطالعات در زمینه آموزش تربیت بدنی با یادگیری ترکیبی انجام شده و نواقص، خلأها و محدودیت‌های مطالعات و الگوهای پیشین را رفع و الگوی جامعی از عناصر برنامه درسی تربیت بدنی با یادگیری ترکیبی ارائه می‎‌کند. پیشنهاد می‌شود یادگیری ترکیبی در درس تربیت بدنی با توجه به عناصر شناسایی شده در این پژوهش برنامه‌ریزی، طراحی و اجرا شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

  1. Almonacid-Fierro, A., de Carvalh, R. S., & Castillo-Retamal, F. (2021). The Practicum in Times of Covid-19: Knowledge Developed by Future Physical Education Teachers in Virtual Modality. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20, 3, 68-83. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.3.5
  2. Blain, O. D., Standage, M., & Curran, T. (2022). Physical education in a post-COVID world: A blended-gamified approach. European Physical Education Review, 28, 3, 757-776. DOI: 10.1177/1356336X221080372
  3. Calderon, A., Scanlon, D., MacPhail, A., & Moody, B. (2021). An integrated blended learning approach for physical education teacher education programmes: teacher educators’ and pre-service teachers’ experiences. An integrated blended learning approach for physical education teacher education programmes: teacher educators’ and pre-service teachers’ experiences. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26, 6, 562-577.
  4. Chan, W. K., Leung, K. I., Ho, C. C., Wu, C. W., Lam, K. Y., Wong, N., . . . Tse, A. C. Y. (2021). Effectiveness of online teaching in physical education during COVID-19 school closures: A survey study of frontline physical education teachers in Hong kong. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21(4), 1622-1628.
  5. Cruickshank, V., Pill, S., & Mainsbridge, C. (2021). Just do some physical activity': Exploring experiences of teaching physical education online during Covid-19. University Of Tasmania. Issues in Educational Research, 31, 1, 76-93. https://hdl.handle.net/102.100.100/22996904.v1
  6. D'Agostino, E. M., Urtel, M., Webster, C. A., McMullen, J., & Culp, B. (2021). Virtual Physical Education during COVID-19: Exploring Future Directions for Equitable Online Learning Tools. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Aug 26; 3:716566. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.716566.
  7. Dana, A., Khajehaflaton, S., Salehian, M. H., & Sarvari, S. (2021). Effects of an Intervention in Online Physical Education Classes on Motivation, Intention, and Physical Activity of Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of School Health, 8(3), 158-166. doi: 10.30476/intjsh.2021.91103.1145
  8. Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2013). Effect of blended learning environment on transfer of learning: an experimental study. J Comput Assisted Learn. 29:518–29. 10.1111/jcal.12009
  9. Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 1-16.
  10. Firmansyah, G., Istiawan, N., Setyawan, T., & Pawitra, P. R. A. (2023). The Importance of Online Media toward Physical Education during Covid-19 Pandemic. International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology, 7(1), 204–207.
  11. Gil-Espinosa, F. J., López-Fernández, I., Espejo, R., & Burgueño, R. (2023). Physical Education Curricular Elements in Blended Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 42(3), 525-534. Retrieved Jun 30, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2021-0265
  12. González-Calvo, G., Barba-Martín, R. A., Bores-García, D., & Hortigüela-Alcalá, D. (2022). The (virtual) teaching of physical education in times of pandemic. European Physical Education Review, 28(1), 205–224.
  13. Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M., & Bull, F. C. (2020). Global Trends in Insufficient Physical Activity among Adolescents: A Pooled Analysis of 298 Population-Based Surveys with 1·6 Million Participants. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4 (1): 23–35.
  14. Howells, K., Murray, A., Pearson, J., & Whewell, E. (2022). Making the impossible, possible. Lessons learnt to ensure embodied physical education teacher education within COVID-19 times and beyond, regardless of the learning medium. Practice. 4 (2), pp. 125-135.
  15. Howley, D. (2022). Experiences of teaching and learning in K-12 physical education during COVID-19: an international comparative case study. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27, 6, 608-625.
  16. Kim Le, T. T., & Thu Trinh, T. T. (2021). Teaching Physical Education Online during the Pandemic of COVID-19: An Investigation into Lecturer's Perceptions. ICSET 2021: 5th International Conference on E-Society, E-Education and E-Technology, 91–96.
  17. Kim, M., Santiago, J. A., Woong Park , Ch., & Kim, M. J. (2022). Adapted Physical Education Teaching Online During COVID-19: Experiences from the South of the United States, International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69:1, 239-252.
  18. Konukman, F., Filiz, B., & Ünlü, H. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of teaching physical education using online learning during the COVID-19: A quantitative study in Turkey. PLoS ONE 17(6): e0269377. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269377
  19. Korcz, A., Krzysztoszek, J., Łopatka, M., Popeska, B., Podnar, H., Filiz, B., Mileva, E., Kryeziu, A. R., & Bronikowski, M. (2021). Physical Education Teachers’ Opinion about Online Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Comparative Study of European Countries. Sustainability, 13, 11730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111730
  20. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 62(10): e1-34.
  21. Liu, H., Zhu, J., Duan, Y. et al. (2022). Development and students’ evaluation of a blended online and offline pedagogy for physical education theory curriculum in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Tech Research Dev 70, 2235–2254.
  22. Lobo, J. (2022). A sudden shift: Students’ perception of distance and online education in physical education amidst COVID-19 Pandemic. Edu Sportivo: Indonesian Journal of Physical Education, 3 (3), 200-216.
  23. Ming, Sh. (2023). Hurdling Physical Education Classes in an Online Learning Modality. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6, 2, 1273-1275
  24. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement, Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264-269.
  25. Mozaffari, S. A. A., Sabaghiyanrad, L., & Hatami, H. (2014). Comparative Study about Effectiveness of two Different Teaching Methods of Traditional and Integrated of Physical Education on Learning Biology and Development of Social Skills of Male Junior High Students. Journal of Sports and Motor Development and Learning, 6(2), 217-230.
  26. (2019). Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report 2019. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/childrens/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2019.
  27. Østerlie, O., Sargent, J., Killian, C., Garcia-Jaen, M., García-Martínez, S., & Ferriz-Valero, A. (2023). Flipped learning in physical education: A scoping review. European Physical Education Review, 29(1), 125–144.
  28. Prasetyo, A., Sir, I., & Amir, A. (2022). Learning Innovations in Physical Education, Sports, and Health during the Covid-19 Pandemic. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(2), 269-277.
  29. Rosell, G. A. (2022). Challenges Encountered by Physical Education Teachers on Blended Learning Approach in Physical Education in times of Covid 19 Pandemic. International Journal of Research Publications (IJRP.ORG). 95, 1, 311-325.
  30. Sandelowski, M., Voils, C., Barroso, J. (2006). Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Res Sch., 13(1): 29.
  31. Setyawan, P. B., Kamadi, L., & Haeruddin, S. (2022). Efforts to Improve the Quality of Movement Activities of Physical Education, Sports and Health, During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review. 2, 1, 1-9.
  32. Shape America (2020). COVID-19 resources for health and physical education. Retrieved July 5, 2023 from https://www.shapeamerica.org/covid19-resources.aspx
  33. Shehu, M. (2021). The Impact of the Pandemic Covid-19 on the Student’s Learning Process. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 8, 3, 97-102.
  34. Syah, H., Irmansyah, J., Hulfian, L., & Lubis, M. R. (2022). Hybrid Learning Space as an Alternative for Physical Education Learning Post Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 10(5), 1047 -1059.
  35. Yan Stralen, M. M., Yildirim, M., Wulp, A., te Velde, S. J., Verloigne, M., Doessegger, A., et al.. (2014). Measured sedentary time and physical activity during the school day of European 10- to 12-year-old children: the ENERGY project. J Sci Med Sport. 17:201–206.
  36. Wang, C., Omar Dev, R. D., Soh, K. G, Mohd Nasirudddin, N. J., Yuan, Y., & Ji. X. (2023). Blended learning in physical education: A systematic review. Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 9; 11:1073423.
  37. Webster, C. A., D’Agostino, E., Urtel, M., McMullen, J., Culp, B., Loiacono, C. A. E., & Killian, C. (2021). Physical Education in the COVID Era: Considerations for Online Program Delivery Using the Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program Framework. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0182
  38. World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Updated exercise recommendations issued by World Health Organization
  39. Yen, L. H. J., & Hui, S. Y. S. (2022). Nurturing Future-Ready Learners in the new normal through Physical Education lessons: Reflections from two Singapore PE Teacher. Proceedings of the 8th ACPES (ASEAN Council of Physical Education and Sport) International Conference, ACPES 2022, October 28th – 30th, 2022, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia.
  40. Yu, J., & Jee, Y-S. (2020). Analysis of Online Classes in Physical Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 11, 1, 3, DOI:10.3390/educsci11010003
  41. Zheng, W., Ma, Y.-Y., & Lin, H.-L. (2021). Research on Blended Learning in Physical Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Chinese Students. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211058196.