اثربخشی درس تربیت بدنی در مدارس پویا بر توسعه شایستگی جسمانی دانش آموزان 9 ساله

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه رفتار حرکتی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران

3 گروه رفتار حرکتی، پژوهشگاه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران

چکیده
هدف این پژوهش، بررسی اثربخشی درس تربیت‌بدنی در مدارس پویا بر توسعه شایستگی جسمانی دانش‌آموزان 9ساله در مقایسه با رویکرد آموزش تربیت‌بدنی در مدارس سنتی بودجامعه آماری پژوهش، همه دانش‌آموزان 9ساله شهرستان زاهدان بودند که به طور تصادفی 65 نفر دانش‌آموز از دو مدرسه پویا (31 نفر) و مدرسه سنتی (34 نفر) انتخاب شدند. در مرحله اول از همه دانش‌آموزان شرکت‌کننده آزمون چابکی و مهارت‌های حرکتی کانادایی و آزمون استقامت هوازی گرفته شد و سطح فعالیت بدنی آن‌ها با گام‌شمار محاسبه و ثبت شد. سپس گروه مدارس پویا در یک دوره مداخله سه‌‌ماهه در محیط غنی‌شده و 24 جلسه‌ای در ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ­ﻫﺎی درس تربیت‌بدنی (کتاب دست­نامه دوره اول ابتدایی و بخش حیطه دانشی و نگرشی کتاب راهنمای تدریس تربیت‌بدنی) ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮدند. دانش‌آموزان گروه کنترل نیز در دوره تربیت‌بدنی به روش سنتی شرکت کردند. پس از پایان دوره مداخله‌ای از هر دو گروه پس‌آزمون گرفته شد. داده‌ها با استفاده از آزمون من ویتنی و آنالیز کوواریانس تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد که کلاس درس تربیت‌بدنی مدارس پویا در مقایسه با مدارس سنتی منجر به افزایش سطح فعالیت بدنی روزانه دانش‌آموزان (آزمون گام‌شمار) شد، اما تفاوت معناداری در آزمون چابکی مهارت‌های حرکتی کانادایی (CAMSA) و استقامت هوازی (PACER) مشاهده نشد؛ بنابراین مدارس پویا می‌توانند به سیاست‌گذاران و برنامه‌ریزان کلاس درس تربیت‌بدنی و ارتقای سطح فعالیت بدنی کودکان در مدارس یاری رسانند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


  1.  

    1. Asadi Jokar, S., Yadullahzadeh, A., & Rafii, S. (2023). The effect of providing primary school games and dynamic school on the physical literacy of second year elementary school students (Master's thesis). University of Nasibah Campus, Tehran.
    2. Austarlian Sports Commission. (2005). Active after-school communities–Community coach training program. Canberra: ASC.
    3. Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18(1), 5-8.
    4. Casey, A., & Quennerstedt, M. (2015). “I just remember rugby”: Re-membering physical education as more than a sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 86(1), 40-50.
    5. Castelli, D.M., Centeio, E.E., Beighle, A.E., Carson, R.L., & Nicksic, H.M. (2014). Physical literacy and comprehensive school physical activity programs. Preventive Medicine, 66, 95-100.
    6. Cocca, A., Espino Verdugo, F., Ródenas Cuenca, L.T., & Cocca, M. (2020). Effect of a game-based physical education program on physical fitness and mental health in elementary school children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 4883.
    7. Díaz-Cueto, M., Hernández-Álvarez, J.L., & Castejón, F.J. (2010). Teaching games for understanding to in-service physical education teachers: Rewards and barriers regarding the changing model of teaching sport. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29(4), 378-398.
    8. Dugas, E. (207). Leveling the playing field: assessing physical literacy in children and youth with physical disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/subject-report-series-pe/levelling-the-playing-field-the-physical-education-subject-report
    9. Ebrahimi Doulatabadi, R., Hajizadeh, A., Mokhtari, F., Bagheri, S., Menami, F., Tagvi-Moadh, F., et al. (2022). Dynamic school teaching guide. Tehran: Menadi Tarbiat Cultural Institute.
    10. Fawkner, S., Henretty, J., Knowles, A. M., Nevill, A., & Niven, A. (2014). The influence of maturation, body size and physical self-perceptions on longitudinal changes in physical activity in adolescent girls. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32(4), 392-401.
    11. Fernández-Prieto, I., & Giné-Garriga, M. (2019). Barriers and motivations perceived by adolescents related to physical activity. Qualitative study through discussion groups. Revista Espanola de Salud Publica, 93, e201908047-e.
    12. Frank, M. L., Flynn, A., Farnell, G.S., & Barkley, J.E. (2018). The differences in physical activity levels in preschool children during free play recess and structured play recess. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness, 16(1), 37-42.
    13. Gabbett, T., Jenkins, D., & Abernethy, B. (2009). Game-based training for improving skill and physical fitness in team sport athletes. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4(2), 273-283.
    14. Graf, C., Koch, B., Kretschmann-Kandel, E., Falkowski, G., Christ, H., Coburger, S., et al. (2004). Correlation between BMI, leisure habits and motor abilities in childhood (CHILT-project). International Journal of Obesity, 28(1), 22-26.
    15. Harris, J. (2015). Association for physical education health position paper.
    16. Harvey, S., Song, Y., Baek, J. H., & Van Der Mars, H. (2016). Two sides of the same coin: Student physical activity levels during a game-centred soccer unit. European Physical Education Review, 22(4), 411-429.
    17. Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Perez Pueyo, A., & Calderón, A. (2016). Effect of the pedagogical model on the physical self-concept of students in physical education. Reto, 1, 1-20.
    18. Kohl, H.W., & Cook, H.D. (2013). Educating the student body: Taking physical activity and physical education to school. Committee on Physical Activity and Physical Education in the School Environment; Food and Nutrition Board; Institute of Medicine
    19. Lumba-Brown, A., Yeates, K.O., Sarmiento, K., Breiding, M.J., Haegerich, T.M., Gioia, G.A., et al. (2018). Centers for disease control and prevention guideline on the diagnosis and management of mild traumatic brain injury among children. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(11), e182853-e.
    20. Manzari Tavakoli, M.H., Shojaei, M., & Norouzi, K. (2021). Effects of local indigenous games on cognitive function, physical literacy and academic achievement among children 8 to 12 years old. Journal of Sports and Motor Development and Learning, 13(3), 333-354.
    21. Mokhtari Hizji, F., Ali Dost Qahfarkhi, E., Drodian, M.A.A., & Bagheri, S. (2023). Identifying the factors affecting the implementation of the dynamic school plan: A grounded theory study. Journal of Health Promotion Management, 12(2), 1-16.
    22. Mokhtari Hizji, F., Ali Dost Qahfarkhi, E., Drodian, A.A., & Bagheri, S. (2023). Psychometrics of related factors on the implementation of dynamic school plan scale. Journal of Health Promotion Management, 12(5), 88-100.
    23. Mayorga-Vega, D., Viciana, J., & Cocca, A. (2013). Effects of a circuit training program on muscular and cardiovascular endurance and their maintenance in schoolchildren. Journal of Human Kinetics, 37(1), 153-160.
    24. Mandigo, J., Lodewyk, K., & Tredway, J. (2019).Examining the impact of a teaching games for understanding approach on the development of physical literacy using the passport for life assessment tool. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 38(2), 136-145.
    25. Nathan, S. (2015). Coaching school hockey in Malaysia: A exploratory analysis and effect of improvised TGfU pedagogical model on small sided game play. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(4), 712.
    26. Miller, A., Christensen, E., Eather, N., Gray, S., Sproule, J., Keay, J., et al. (2016). Can physical education and physical activity outcomes be developed simultaneously using a game-centered approach? European Physical Education Review, 22(1), 113-133.
    27. Okely, A.D., Booth, M.L., & Patterson, J.W. (2001). Relationship of physical activity to fundamental movement skills among adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33(11), 1899-1904.
    28. Pate, R.R., Freedson, P.S., Sallis, J.F., Taylor, W.C., Sirard, J., Trost, S.G., et al. (2002). Compliance with physical activity guidelines: prevalence in a population of children and youth. Annals of Epidemiology, 12(5), 303-308.
    29. Ramezani Nezhad, R. (2023). Designing a model of effective factors in creating active and happy schools. Research on Educational Sport, 11(31), 49-80.
    30. Reilly, T., & White, C. (2005). Small-sided games as an alternative to interval-training for soccer players. Science and Football, 1, 355-358.
    31. Schneider, P.L., Crouter, S.E., & Bassett, D.R. (2004). Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: comparison of 13 models. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36(2), 331-335.
    32. Santos Rocha, R., Jimenez, A., & Rieger, T. (2015). Europeactive’s essentials for fitness instructors. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA.
    33. Sirard, J.R., & Pate, R.R. (2001). Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Medicine, 31, 439-454.
    34. Sgro, F., Quinto, A., Platania, F., & Lipoma, M. (2019). Assessing the impact of a physical education project based on games approach on the actual motor competence of primary school children. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19, 781-786.
    35. Shahreza, F.S., Parvinpour, S., & Namazizadeh, M. (2022). The effect of teaching games for understanding (TGfU) Approach on aerobic endurance, motor performance and promoting physical activity among ten-year-old boys. Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 12(23), 20-35.
    36. Wazini Tahir, A., Hayati, A., & Pak Zamir, F. (2014). The relationship between the level of physical activities and the development of basic motor skills in elementary school children. Motor Behavior, 14, 163-178.
    37. Zhang, L., & Cheung, P. (2019). Making a difference in PE lessons: Using a low organized games approach to teach fundamental motor skills in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4618.
دوره 12، شماره 35
خرداد 1403
صفحه 41-54

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 اردیبهشت 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 26 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 08 مهر 1403